on, the record, a rather fulsome and complete set o facts, not just everything t proceed with the trial, bu laying out for the public an nation the degree to which there is cynicism and fear o losing an audience that wa driving foxes decisions. not some sort of journalisti imperative that had to b mistaken dominion accomplished both o its aims, in a sense they wanted vindication, and they wanted there to be public record of what went awry, looking under the rock and seeing how fox acted in this time of crisis to a great degree, dominio achieve that, even if they did not get all that they were seeking. fox news wanted to pay to make this go away the murdaugh s have a record o brushing such things off they can afford the greatest litigators in the country, and have hired them again an again. in this case, winston an strong, late by dan webb, on of the most fearsome corporate litigators in the united states they were happy ultimately t
recent days but over the periods, fox would ve been happy to settle. fox would have been happy. fox rightly was fearing rupert murdoch, the 92-year-old founder of fox news, appearing in the witness stand in th next day or two, to be questioned quite tough lay under oath, in front of th public, rather than in a deposition setting additionally, you would ve had some of these top names, including tucker carlson, john hannity, testifying about what they knew and didn t, what the believed and didn t, whether they knew what they were presenting to their millions o viewers were not only untrue but to be lies in the moment those are tough, tough thing to have to address fully but dominion wasn t interested in settling this case until it had on the record a rather fulsome and complete set o facts, not all that we would v received had the trial gon forward, but nonetheless layin
we know that strzok and paige talked about the so-called insurance policy with who we believe is andrew mccabe, who was fired today, and remember, july 1st, before they interviewed clinton, beforee comey came forward and went public on july 5th, they revealed that loretta lynch knew the fix was in in the clinton investigation. let s see. strzok, page, mccabe, comey, and loretta lynch all knowing? now, they were hesitant to investigate hillary clinton, we also learned, because they might win and retaliate against them. those are facts, those are real text messages and it s only a small sampling of what has been released. there is evidence showing and proving all this. so what is the media have to prove as it relates to trump-russia collusion a year later? nothing. no evidence.io no facts. they are basing everything on nothing but their own conspiracy theory and their own little media bubble. we have been giving you facts,
citizenship and should come with a warning, caution, you are about to enter a no facts zone. we re joined by joy reid and david. david, this to me seems to be a microversion of the establishment republican fact-based republican versus the renegade, more free-thinking republicans who seem to be controlling the party today. yeah, but it s got a kind of ironic twist. bill o reilly doesn t seem to have done his homework or proper historical research. the question it looks like he s trying to answer which is what kind of physical condition was ronald reagan in in the final pat of his presidency is a question that should be able to answered objectively. reagan seemed to have faded in audience and it takes americans a long time to learn the truth about health conditions of his president. it took a generation about woodrow wilson, fdr. john kennedy only within the past decade or so.
thermacare has patented heat cells that penetrate deep to increase circulation and accelerate healing. let s review: heat, plus relief, plus healing, equals thermacare. the proof that it heals is you. i can say with certainty george will libels bill o reilly. did you call me? no, i didn t promise to call you. you have my phone number. the memo is presented to howard baker. howard baker took one look at it and said to the man who wrote it this is not the ronald reagan i know. that was the end of any influence that he had. you re not telling the truth. you are actively misleading the american people. you are lying. here is what george will wrote in his washington post op-ed on thursday about bill o reilly s book. the book is nonsense call history and execrable citizenship and should come with a warning, caution, you are about to enter a no facts zone.