Page 49 - Noel News Today

Peter, your perspective? >> i think we did move closer to the resolving the he said a and as ms. some huvy now three "she saids" she declared her terror, under death threats she came forward and gave a very powerful story with gaps in detail that experts of sexual trauma say not only are very common but make it credible. for judge kavanaugh, he arrived and im sure he believers that he did not commit a sexual assault on professor ford, but he displayed a very unusual public love and affection, so...

By his explosive rebuttal, but it all boiled down to the two claims that remain at odds. >> dr. ford, with what degree of certainty do you believe brett kavanaugh assaulted you. >> 100%. >> 100%. >> none of these allegations are true. >> correct. >> no doubt in your minds. >> zero, 100% certain. >> lets bring in peter emerson working in three democratic administrations joel payne, and ashley pratt, board member of republican women for progress. noel, lets go with you, do you think this hearing b...

Those numbers will only grow. >> noel, jeff flake calling for the investigation. could that ultimately be what sinks kavanaughs nomination? and do republicans feel this was a betrayal? >> no, not at all. i think everybody understand what flake was feeling. when you looked at him when he came out of the committee, you is a saw he was conflicted. hes not a man that hides what he feels. and i think that, you know, like i said before, nobody is upset with flake for doing this for his conscience, for...

Needs, is to allow a week for an fbi investigation to back up dr. ford or back up judge kavanaugh, either/or, then this is the right thing to do. >> do you, ashley, see the democrats efforts as a delay tactic? >> i dont see it as a delay tactic. i see it as something that needs to happen. they were able to get republicans to come to the table on that. i fully applaud and support senator flake for coming out and doing this. he really showed he was willing to put principle over party and he has do...

Another. theres no way that this thing is just going to go away. if you were smart, he would take a step back and say, all right, you know what, does he have the right to ask him, hey, did you really say that, i mean is that really appropriate you said that? >> he has the right to fire him because he thinks he said it. >> i wouldnt fire him but i would bring him in for what we call a counseling session and say, hey, you got to knock it off, go back to work and put bad guys in jail. >> no, im say...

Going to go away if he were smart, he would take a step back. does he have the right to ask him? did you really say that? >> he has the right to fire him because he thinks he said it. >> i wouldnt fire him but i would call him in. hey, knock it off. now go back and put bad guys in jail. >> he has the right to do it. is it right to do it, thats the question. if he resigns, the president has an easy path to putting noel francisco in there. a man it is assumed would be much more amenable. do you go...

Line. hes a known conservative, he is expected to do trumps bidding, regarding the probe. but, when it comes to the deputy ag job, the president wants rosenstein to resign, if he wants him out. why? because if he resigns, then trump can immediately replace him with someone else, with the title acting deputy ag. no need for confirmation. no need to deal with congress. delays, doubts, we see whats playing out with kavanaugh. and lets be honest, the presidents record with picking people to do big j...

Were fired or to resign. that follows a line of secession. noel francisco, great name, the solicitor general, he is next in line. hes a known conservative, he is expected to do trumps bidding, regarding the probe. but, when it comes to the deputy ag job, the president wants rosenstein to resign, if he wants him out. why? because if he resigns, then trump can immediately replace him with someone else, with the title acting deputy ag. no need for confirmation. no need to deal with congress. delays...

His report to the person overseeing the investigation. acting deputy attorney general or noel francisco to take over in that case. i talked to democrats who are following this very closely and the one thing they have been fearful of in the firing of rosenstein is whoever replaces him is is they put the report in a safe and not release it. that will be a source of discussion and debate going forward. what will this new person in charge of the investigation to allow the public to see and how that ...

>> he endorses these conspiracy theories. he also doesnt have any prosecutorial experience. hes overseeing one of the most important investigations in the history of justice department. hes been a very political solicitor general. the person in that job has tough political decisions to make and cases where you have to deal we the justice department precedent but big policy questions. in our administration, obama administration, the solicitor general switched one time. noel has done it nearly two...