undermine this excuse that somehow it s a way to better implement the law. the only reason they are doing it is because it s going to hurt employment. they know that and, again, that won t change in a year or two. so at this moment is in no way making it easier. it s simply denying that this is going to happen time as you or two. say the motive for this is because it is going to hurt employment and small businesses letting people go or reducing their hours so they reduce the number of full-time workers and get under the 50 worker limit at which point there is no employer mandate because of that, people are going to lose their job. that s right. involuntarily and they are going to get hurt at the pells and thus they are doing. this which totally undermines the argument that it s a way to improve implementation. that s right. this is bay to do non-implementation. the argument has to be this is a political move. it s not a move to improve