the stand tomorrow. laney davis standing by for a preview. plus, andrew weisman watched the testimony this week and they will join me today. somehow a fictional cannibal was not the most interesting thing he said. biden spokesperson joins me with her reaction. later, my friend and colleague stops by to talk about his new book and how small acts of courage of the engines of dem being democracy. okay. the date was january 12th, 2018. this was the headline in the wall street journal. trump lawyer a raged $130,000 payment for adult-film star s silence. obviously that was a dpraby headline even by 2018 standards. there was a lot going on at the time. the big news that night was actually the sitting president of the united states saying something completely racist about african countries. but that story from the wall street journal, the one about the hush money for the porn star still broke through that night. quite a story today in the wall street journal. and i quote, trump
have a good weekend. when donald trump first refused to concede the election in 2020, republicans in congress didn t really know what to do with it. at the time a lot of republicans just kept her mouth shut, hoping that trump would eventually give up. but they re also the republicans who went all in, who started scheming with the trump white house about how to keep joe biden from being certified as the duly elected president. there was one congressman in particular who was way out in front of the effort, organizing a number of his colleagues to sign on to a highly dubious lawsuit challenging biden s victory in four key swing states. the republican lawmakers are getting behind the suit, leading the effort on capitol hill is scotsman mike johnson. what s behind it? there s a lot of irregularity fraud, and hijinks, let s be frank. but we are going to have a landslide of house republicans who are going to sign onto our amicus brief to support this. mike johnson, a littl
Photos well? from paris for the school year, you get to vote? as i understand, students are excluded, it s tricky because the wording says work authorization and i think there are some students who work at least on campus so that is the real problem if you decide who gets to vote, citizenship gives you a bright line, citizens if you will, noncitizens don t develop and that s how that are and state elections to interview open up to permanent residence the question becomes, what about students, people who have second homes in the city have an interest in services, police, fire and what about illegal immigrants here who send their kids to new york city schools? they have an interest in the mayor s race, what about them. paul: jason, what is the motive here? proponents as people are subject to new york city rules and laws
Prosperity. no one who makes these decisions does it in their own neighborhood. make you richer. has hazleton become richer. no, quite the opposite. it becomes much more difficult. when your income tax goes down. our population grew by 50% but our tax revenue stayed the same. that s when we realized we not only had we had illegal immigration problem on top of it all but no, when people are coming in and are of lower income or lower end of the economic ladder, that s less tax money that you are getting and it becomes more difficult to provide services. tucker: why do all the experts like ron brownstein at cnn say you are a bigot if you have concerns and they i mean, they re telling you are richer and happier. why won t you admit it. sure. i had this discussion. i was on the panel with mayor bloomberg at one time when he said, you know, new york city s economy would crash if it didn t have illegal immigrants. who would wash our dishes and bus our tables and clean
United states are citizens and how many are noncitizens, meaning aliens both legal and illegal. then we have to know apportionment. if congress decides as it should to stop counting illegal aliens, we need to know how many are in each category. it s absurd that states like california have an inflated number of representatives in congress because they have so many illegal aliens. so, there are so many reasons. let me quickly respond to your previous guest. i couldn t stop laughing. his notion that it s unconstitutional to count citizens, ask people if they are citizens or not. look we started doing this? the 1820 clean success. the founding fathers were still alive in 1820. if it was unconstitutional to ask are you a citizen they would say don t ask the citizenship question that s unconstitutional. the second thing is the supreme court ruled in 1964 from west bury vs. sanders that diluting the voting of u.s. citizens which is what happens when you count the illegal aliens in a district,