welcome back, guys. it is time for in case you missed it. after the job vice president kamala harris has done at the borders, we are not sure about the newest addition to her portfolio. ai czar, literally. she met with major tech companies on the risk of artificial intelligence and told the ceo's of microsoft and google to make sure the ai products are safe. harris? >> she may know personally what artificial intelligence is. >> nailed it. >> it is based on what we have seen, per the job she has been given and the under performance or nonperformance displayed that. i would say this though, she is dedicated -- dedicated to adding things to her resume. let's see if she can just check one box. >> how about just fulfill one of the title's duty. >> she has been given these impossible tasks.
but this whole other layer and the fact that she's being deceitful and that she is somehow almost spying on them and drawing them into her friendship circle and pretending that she's understanding of what's going on. but she has this whole other life that she's going to go back to, write a book. i thought it was really fascinating and when it shows you about the world. it also a dramatic story about someone being deceptive about who they are. the theme and the tone very much puts you in the mind of the work. and i think some of the performers are, their nonperformance. the whole thing has that smack of authenticity and that's why said there is definitely a loach element to this and it is eye—opening and it's heartbreaking at times. but the thing that i think gives it the mainstream edge is that there is also this slightly melodramatic contrivance in the story
are, their nonperformance. the whole thing has that smack of authenticity and that's why said there is definitely a loach element to this and it is eye—opening and it's heartbreaking at times. but the thing that i think gives it the mainstream edge is that there is also this slightly melodramatic contrivance in the story about her own deception and obviously, i love juliette binoche anyway. she plays this really well. it's interesting that she is playing a character that's playing a character and there's a dual layer to the performance anyway. really interesting. and best out this week. you have seen the quiet girl? i loved it. beautiful. gentle. gorgeous storytelling and often do i mess of saying this in a remarkable performance by very young actress. astonishing and it's a directorial
kind of testing the fab -- fabric of our society. >> liberty is the ability to ask responsibly, we need a responsible public. and a public that is individual responsible, not blaming each other or circumstance, one of the worst things that can happen to a culture it is given a great excuse for nonperformance for failing to move forward. the worst impact of this pandemic has been the suggestion that america has a big excuse. it seldom that i ask for any performance in our culture that people don't lead with the fact, you know we've been through tough times, we're having to adjust to the pandemic. well, we need as a country to say, pandemic or not, we believe that free people, individually responsible,
the entrance exam, it's interesting because i talked about inequality, isn't that on the school systems? i looked at the curriculum particularly black and hispanic neighborhoods, they are watered down designed for failure, there's no way you could pass an interest exam to be schools with these curriculums. you don't take the courses they are the ones who want to keep asian exclusions who are excelling, it is crazy to me. >> it is crazy and as you say, want to talk about scandals and nonperformance, public school systems in most of our big cities are outrageous, failing are black and latino students. i think in yorkville students they are not even proficient at mass and reading but as you break it down to black and
so -- that's all just stuff that happened today. there's an underappreciated element in this administration. you can really see it on a day like today. and -- i mean, best fake word i can come up with to describe it is nonperformance. they say they're doing stuff, and then they don't follow through. they don't do it. even when the president has personally put himself on a limb to express his enthusiasm for this thing, he does not get done, even when it's a serious mortal disaster for millions of americans. even when it's something he declares he has officially done when he's done nothing and plans to do nothing. and even when it's something that's required by law. and sometimes i think their blatant nonperformance is because they're required to do stuff they don't really want to do. but honestly, i think some of it is just because they can't get it together. they can't get it together to do the human work necessary to establish the things they say
and i mean, the best -- the best fake word i can come up with to describe it is nonperformance. they say they're going to do stuff, they say they are doing stuff, and then they just don't follow through. they don't do it. even when the president has personally put himself out on a limb to express his enthusiasm for this thing, he then does not get done. even when it's a serious, mortal disaster for millions of americans. even when it's something he declares he has officially done when he done nothing and plans to do nothing. and even when it's something that's required by law. and sometimes i think their blatant nonperformance is because they're required to do stuff they really don't want to do. but honestly, i think some of it is just because they can't get it together. they can't get it together to do the human work necessary to accomplish the things they say they are doing. but in light of that widespread recurrent, even constant problem across this administration, it makes it all the more remarkable when it turns out there is something they are doing in government, that they are doing
day like today. and i mean, the best -- the best fake word i can come up with to describe it is nonperformance. they say they're going to do stuff, they say they are doing stuff, and then they just don't follow through. they don't do it. even when the president has personally put himself out on a limb to express his enthusiasm for this thing, he then does not get done. even when it's a serious, mortal disaster for millions of americans. even when it's something he declares he has officially done when he done nothing and plans to do nothing. and even when it's something that's required by law. and sometimes i think their blatant nonperformance is because their required to do stuff they really don't want to do. but honestly, i think some of it is just because they can't get it together. they can't get it together to do the human work necessary to accomplish the things they say they are doing. but in light of that widespread recurrent, even constant problem across this administration, it
lands in a certain state to help elect someone and he'll be doing that about 5:00 p.m. tonight. but the dynamics are interesting. it's not sarah palin, but also on the ground who is advising the president and the white house three weeks ago. >> trish: this is an interesting set of dynamics because this is steve bannon's guy, really more. having recently left the white house and on his way out said i love this president, i'm still dedicated, so on and so forth but this is incomplete opposition, these two people, roy moore and luther strange. so where does this take us in the conversation and the party? the democrats have their own issues, but the president's landing air force one for luther strange tonight. >> john: he could make the difference. i think that's possible. what you are seeing is just an enormous dissatisfaction within the republican party with the performance of his leadership in washington. >> harris: or nonperformance. >> john: maybe they don't talk about it to the media and the
reasons, even senior executive service employees based on their performance, their nonperformance. that would make a huge difference. in this instances, the secretary lacks the authority. that's a big problem. >> senator, it is not even an hr issue of getting rid of bureaucrats. the way this system is set up there are no incentives for performance. you have a single payer system that has the same problems we see in europe. a doctor shortage, corruption. would you support any kind of vouchers? i've said on the "five" perhaps a charter hospital for our veterans. >> i tend to agree at a minimum they ought to have the option if they want to go into the private system. you're right to point out if this doesn't speak to the failures of a single payer