Page 3 - Nonprofit Developers News Today

Equity and doesnt have a strict framework theyre operating from, i advise they do not enter into the Planning Commission because were having problems getting our businesses through and thats not the intent of our Forward Motion in trying to shift the way that our city operates from the equity lens. If thats the case, then everybody here that would be impacted is saying that she shouldnt be recommended. I will also stand in solidarity with them too. Thank you. Thank you, is there any other member...

Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] supervisor walton. Thank you chair ronen. Ms. Diamond, i do have a couple follow up questions if you dont mind coming back up. Thank you, what Nonprofit Developers have you previously worked with . Family house. The Jewish Community center of San Francisco. The San Francisco campus for jewish living. Temple emmanuel. The blood bank of San Francisco. And then you heard some testimony about not necessarily having a track record of working in certain i...

Seeing none, Public Comment is closed. [gavel] supervisor walton. Thank you chair ronen. Ms. Diamond, i do have a couple follow up questions if you dont mind coming back up. Thank you, what Nonprofit Developers have you previously worked with . Family house. The Jewish Community center of San Francisco. The San Francisco campus for jewish living. Temple emmanuel. The blood bank of San Francisco. And then you heard some testimony about not necessarily having a track record of working in certain i...

Sue diamond seems very well qualified to represent clients before the Planning Commission. I dont think she has the type of perspective that the city is a in desperate need of at the moment. We dont need legal counsel. The planning apartment has lawyers. The Planning Commission has access to lawyers. But we desperately need is people who really understand the major crisis being faced by low and middle income families, and individuals right now in our city. I think she mentioned she supported sb5...

Sue diamond seems very well qualified to represent clients before the Planning Commission. I dont think she has the type of perspective that the city is a in desperate need of at the moment. We dont need legal counsel. The planning apartment has lawyers. The Planning Commission has access to lawyers. But we desperately need is people who really understand the major crisis being faced by low and middle income families, and individuals right now in our city. I think she mentioned she supported sb5...

It could affect all kinds of areas, even here in downtown santa rosa. It is a no win for anybody. Imagine owning a Family Grocery store for 60 years and not knowing whether all your cold items on your shelves will turn into uninsured losses. Now youre walking in the shoes of joe musclesbury. If they shut us down, it could kill a Small Company like. Wearing as pg e contemplates another Public Safety shutoff, or psps as anacronym, and all to prevent sparking wildfires. Have i colleagues in mono co...

Of supervisors, pending two more votes. Once that is completed it will be on the ballot in november. This is really incredible given in 2015, when we had our last housing bond, it was 310 million dollars. The amount has doubled, thats really exciting. We have also talked about putting Affordable Housing in the citys capital plans. We are really planning for Affordable Housing needs as part of our overall city needs and that we are accounting for that every 45 years. When we have expanded the bon...

[applause] thank you, don, and thank you for being an amazing partner in the effort to acquire welding his all over the safety to keep them permanently affordable. Because we know that having Affordable Housing isnt just about new construction, it is about making sure that we preserve existing Affordable Housing, whether its property that we built under the old redevelopment agency, that are in disrepair, or its buildings like this where we are able to acquire it through our small sight Acquisit...

The county department of social services sent some money over to the department of aging saying, how about you help with targeting folks 60 and over. And do an allocation base throughout the state and come up with 66,000 which comes down to us, which is to be used to target older adults, 60 and over , solely recognizing that six a 6,000, and the grand scheme, is not the largest amount of money, but we hope to at least cover some staff time to support the much larger coordinated effort. One other...

They see fit. Okay. So the mandatory so those that are being hit with the mandatory withdrawal, i know theres interest theres interest about how to take those mandatory withdrawals and invest them in other other lack of a better word other investments, so i think thats something we may want to talk about. Maybe mr. Collins is in the audience, and maybe we should talk about a couple of the unions that are interested in that, in passing other information. So its something we should be thinking abo...