chris: we are in the same generation of failed diplomacy advocates, they now criticize with the president is doing. it s a little bit tiresome to hear. what donald trump has been able to accomplish in a short period of time with his aggressive brand of diplomacy is more than they added their entire time under president obama. when beth back to less generation. whether you can achieve anything or its complete disquisition remains to be seen. frankly, it would be remarkable, because the kims don t care about anything except holding onto power. if they are able to take it a step further toward true denuclearization, what they have already compass is significant that category. it s frustrating for me to hear. markey point or less of the world continue to love criticism bombs. we have moved forward. harris: what you make of this suppose a conversation? none of us was in the room, so we can t quantify it. so that leaders north korea didn t see his kids grow up in a world where nukes are?
pence, tillerson, mattis, kelly, and the biggest, baddest military on the planet will take them out. you cannot have any gray area. that s the difference between what president trump is doing and what president obama did. i think that sends the strongest possible message. north korea has borders with russia and they have a big, broad border with china. you want the chinese and the russians to also know that donald trump will pull the trigger if necessary to protect the united states. eboni: congressman, can you also we know north korea didn t start with president obama come, can you talk about president bush, president clinton? jason: we have been funding the north koreans, whatever we had been doing had not worked. the capabilities have grown. we better listen to what they are saying. as we look at the trajectory of these missiles, to be able to touch on guam and alaska and the amendment of the united states to make eboni: they started eight years ago,
defiantly. they ll accelerate their missile program. however it s noteworthy north korea didn t fire this likely intermediate range missile toward guam. this flight path was never a threat. japan decided not to shoot it down and the united states didn t take any military action but had north korea launched this missile the same distance but south we might be talking about something very different right now. japan s foreign minister indicated that perhaps this is a sign that north korea is backing down, perhaps north korea will be willing to sit down with the united states and talk about negotiations, but the sense i get on the ground here, while they are open to a dialogue, they re not going to come to the table from a position of weakness. they say they want to come from a position of strength which is what happens why we continue to see this defiant provocative behavi behavior. will, thank you very much. so helpful to have you on the ground in north korea for us. we bring in cnn po