fascinating is that the new york times thanks that a dirty cop like james comey can write an op-ed opinion when he is about to be indicted by the department of justice. it s really clear that he is basically taking a stand. he s pretending this is all gonna be neutral. if you just read what he s written, he s not being neutral, he s assuming that kavanaugh is guilty of this charges. he s just the same as the democrats. as joe pointed out, james, is a hack. i think it s laughable that the people who are praising him or thinking he s anything of substance of the same people that have been attacking him attacked him throughout the hillary clinton investigation. he s basically irrelevant here. with new development, what they need to do is take a step back and realize the fact that all this, what are the underlying facts of the issue. the facts remain none of these
what s absurd about what i said. i will tell you what s absurd. i will tell you. joe, you ve had your say coming out richard. are you done? so listen, this is very simple. when some people heard the testimony of brett kavanaugh this week and they thought his delivery nullified the message, there s others who don t believe that. others believe his delivery was on spot imperfect. today we sit here. we have very smart law-enforcement, very smart investigators looking into all sides of this case. at the end of this week they will release a report and based on that report senators will have a chance to vote. this comes down to two senators in particular, lisa murkowski from alaska were hutu governors have already said they are against the nomination of brett kavanaugh and susan collins who, let me
steve, wait a minute. they could ve made it, they could ve handled all this privacy. you have every reason to be angry two doctor ford has every reason to be angry at your party. can i finish. both of you have reason to be angry. am i going to be able to make a point quest mark. with your party. you have every reason to be angry because you guys are. [inaudible] we have had hundred 13 different supreme court justices go through this process and make it and not one, not even clarence thomas invoked politics as much as brett kavanaugh did in this. in response to what happened to him from your party. clarence thomas didn t even invoked politics. the supreme court should be above political approach no matter whose in charge of the senate or the house. how can you say that. it s not even worth having a discussion. that s ridiculous.
that they would absolutely do anything to try to stop brett kavanaugh. now what they are doing is weapon rising baseless allegations that have zero corroborating evidence, not a single witness has stepped forward. you look at debra rimer s allegation, the new york times interviewed several dozen people in confined to single people to corroborate her story. she says she doesn t remember. [inaudible] i want to get joe in part we would love to hear your thoughts. i don t think there s any doubt that the democrats have purposely designed this process to be an affront of dignity in the senate and its proceedings. senator feinstein has been a senator for a very long time. she didn t accidentally mess this up. this was a purposeful plan. she designed it this way. when she said her staff didn t leak, it doesn t matter what she said, a democrat leaked the information to the media. that s all that mattered and where we are headed is toward a showdown. there will be about and judge
count another four days from then, actually they can stop the process before they seen the conclusion. conceivably. that will be a political question. if mitch mcconnell jumped the gun, do the people like jeff flake and the senators like he s trying to get lisa murkowski, susan collins, heidi heitkamp, do they say no this isn t what we agreed to, you broke the deal, we won t vote yes? right now they are at 49 yes. the republican from wyoming has unofficially weighed in but they need to have the senators on board. had they not cut this deal with jeff flake they would not have video for confirmation. i talked about the map is a math is the math. it s paramount. if they get a good report from the fbi, you might have as many as 5 53 yes votes. clarence thomas only got 52. this is a good gamble if he wants to love this nomination of brett kavanaugh across the finish line. last question.