Page 126 - Nothing Wrong News Today

Seen. ive got it all wrapped up, ready to go. also developing tonight, we have, yes, the compromised corrupt congenital wire schiff now claiming he did nothing wrong, there was never a subpoena of the phone records of devin nunes in our own john solomon and may be little old me. here to react to the developing story, fox news contributor john solomon. john, the last i checked, part of the job of talk show host, reporters, is that they call sources. they do digging, they would do fact come with d...

Analyst danny cevallos and from washington, you have white house and washington reporter for "politico," daniel litman. >> we know earlier this week the white house counsel was huddling behind closed door, talking strategy and what are they planning to do? what kind of defense are they planning to mount when this entire process reaches the senate? >> so theres actually a deadline on friday, today, if they plan to participate at all in the house process. but in the senate, you might have presiden...

Who knew under oath? >> i think if the president is following the advice of his legal counsel, the answer to that would be no. the president may not follow that advice. but i think the question as to what kind of defense the white house puts forward will also be interesting in terms of what these senate republicans want. in the house you saw the senate republicans largely line up behind what the president wants, which is a defense of his actions, not a defense that maybe this was bad but not imp...

President also says we will have witnesses like schiff, like speaker pelosi, and the bidens. so these are people that the white house has been pushing republican senators to call to the witness stand in a trial. now, of course, it is ultimately up to mitch mcconnell, it is not up to the president, and its notable that the president didnt mention the whistleblower because there have been discussions, jim, about subpoenaing the whistleblower to testify, but that appears to have been put off the ta...

On impeachment. we have been given an opportunity to respond. we will tomorrow and hopefully they are open to hearing from our side of pennsylvania avenue. >> bill: two more questions. what has the president said to you or others privately about his willingness to testify in a senate trial? >> well, listen. i wouldnt certainly discuss any private conversations i have had with anyone, let alone the president. what he has said publicly. he knows he has done nothing wrong. the president is complete...

Before you gavel and start your statement and before you go any further, i would like to know two things. when do you plan on scheduling our minority hearing today and number two when are we actually going to have real witnesses here that are fact witnesses in this case? when? or what you said many years ago, has faded, just like the leaves in fall. i dont really care inform that somebody else gives us a report. undoubtly chairmanship is dhairm over everything with impeachment and he doesnt get ...

And going for the bidens? how about the vice president? why wont he produce a single document about his call with zelensky? the veep has called the report either knowledgeable of or an active participant in an effort to extract from a foreign nation the personal political benefits sought by the president. same goes for the secretary of state who said, if theyre legitimate questions about the ukraine, we have to ask those questions. you know theres no legitimate questions about ukraine. where did...

Such a patently ridiculous first line of defense. >> you know, one thing im wondering if will come up today is weve heard the republicans say that the election should take care of this. were in an election year. the founders, i can tell you, did not think that an election, the timing may not be great as we go into 2020. but this was not about elections. whenever there was a problem, impeachment was the check. you do it now. you do not wait. so i wonder whether the republicans will raise that wit...

Zelensky? the veep is called in the report either knowledgeable of or an active participant in an effort to extract from a foreign nation the personal political benefits sought by the president. same goes for the secretary of state who all of a sudden said, hey, if there are legitimate questions about the ukraine, we have to ask those questions. you know there are no legitimate questions about ukraine. where did you get that? the secretary of energy, the acting chief of staff, what do these peop...

Raises the question, if this is what we know, what are we missing? all along weve been asking, if the president did nothing wrong, why isnt he demanding that these people with the information come up and clear him? weve heard him say before hed love to testify. no, he wouldnt. he doesnt even trust himself to tell the truth. but if they dont put up people who they say explain it away, how long can his party ignore the obvious? thats the argument. all right. coming up, understandably this would ...