Is no charge to depart from the program at that point. Pg e doesnt have a fee to exit the program during that portion of the time either. They dont have a fee that charge its. The fee that we do include and maybe what youre referring to is the cost responsibility surcharge where if a customer leaves pg es bundedel service and comes to a cca pg e will take a portion of the fees they used to charge that customer and those fees will follow the customer so the bill premiums that i am showing here include that as part of the premium so this is all in image of how your bill changes even though its something were not charging and pg e is charging and they joined the program were including in the numbers so its transparent to customers. And that fee is reflected in every monthly bill . Yes. Its on a separate item from pg e on the cleanpower sf portion of the bill and there is a separate page that this is typically how its happening, a separate page what pg e characterizes as Third Party Charge
Public hearing or wosh workshop, i would appreciate that there is time on the agenda so the others could be heard. I would like to announce that the board approved in the meeting the issuance of bonds. Your staff has it on agenda to get your improvement with bawsca to work it out. And appreciate all the work of the attorneys and outside attorne attorneys. And we worked well together, this matched what our board approved. No need to go back for other approvals. I hope we can go forward today and issue bonds in midjanuary, thank you. Any Public Comment on this item . Hearing none, Public Comment is closed. Madam secretary, read the next order of business. Item 9 is consent calendar, items are to be considered to be retained by the San Francisco Public Utilities commission, and will be acted upon by a single vote of the commission. Would any commissioners wish to remove any items . Seeing none, we will take them together. Motion . Move. Second. Motion is moved and seconded. Any discussion
Premium chart is a good example of just the level of detail we can provide customer when is we talk with them because we will know what tier theyre in and can say what your typical bill is like today and what it would like if you stay with the cleanpower sf program. Its deeper than the cost. Some people see the value and investing in a sustainable future. Right, and so talking about the product. And this is put on. Look you will see the increases in your bills and then people might be inclined to opt out if theyre not reminded of the value behind the clean sf program. I understand and i take your guidance. Thank you. We have go ahead. Thank you. One of the issues reading through the material was the issue its really an issue of auditing and that is who will determine the pass through cost that pg e shifts to its shareholders versus to the rate payers . Is that a function of the state agency or do we have independent jurisdiction over that process . We dont have independent jurisdiction
Was stated if memory serves me at not more than 2 cents 2. 5 cents over what they currently charge customers b again that is a proposal. It will go through the cupuc process and may change. When you say 2. 5 cents is that literally like the 21. 97 would go to 21. 99 . Harlan kelly, general manager, so its about 6 per month versus 11dollar premium that we have equivalent to 6. Yes, and thats for thats reflective for the cost difference between providing a Renewable Energy credit versus firmed and shaped renewable power, so its the product difference that is embedded in that price difference which goes to commissioner olagues statement that people need to understand the value behind what the Price Premium is addressing. And credit that pg e can purchase rather than generate the clean power themselves. Correct. Correct. And we limit that component to 5 of the overall portfolio. Thank you. Commissioner moran any other . No. Commissioner vietor. Yes, i had a follow up with that. With the co
And bawsca would be teed up to the bonds in january. Thank you. Commissioner moran. I would like to make a comment. This is amazingly good. Its something where a need was identified that turned out to benefit us and bawsca. Bawsca had to do the heavy lifting, between legislation and corralling many members, more than on this commission. And one that the agency could not have done. So i think it really marks a real step forward. And a tremendous accomplishment on bawsca and our own staff. And its a nice model for areas where the puc and bawsca can work together. Where there is clearly interest on both sides. And neither interest has to see their interest to the other. I will move the item. So a motion has been made to move the item forward, a second . Second. Its been moved and seconded. Any Public Comment. Yes, sir, and thank you for your patience on the earlier item, by the way. You are very welcome. One comment, i appreciate commissioner morans comments. It was a matter of corralling