We dont it. Is do you feel like trumps contribution was intentional to bring the two countries together are an intentional base a big plant or was it not i remember going with the United States directly they would have not come to south korea. To Even North Korea comply i am i heard you say in an interview to c. N. N. Back in september that if the u. S. Had spent at least one fifth of effort put into the iran deal on the north korean issue is the whole problem could have been resolved do you think the u. S. Is reluctant to bring about a plausible solution to the issue. You know if you had to pay more attention to. The north Korean Nuclear issue i personally believe the us code can come up with a solution but. To use his pain too much attention for military no solutions but i hope the us would pay more attention to the peaceful solution to the north Korean Nuclear problem. Presently and you right now have been praising President Trump for his role in kicking off they enter korean talks
Narrator among the nations unsolved problems of 1967 was the everincreasing flow of american dollars abroad. The balance of payments deficit could easily reach 4 billion. The president , during the final days of december, called a meeting of the men most familiar with the complex problem. Men to whom he could look closest and hardest for solutions. Leading the contention was the chairman of the Federal Reserve board, followed by secretary of the treasury fowler, secretary of state, dean rusk, secretary trowbridge, the budget director charles schultz, chairman of the house ways and means committee, wilbur mills, majority whip, and finally, senator long of louisiana, a member of many committees central to the control of the ations fiscal policy. To an outsider, they look no more than relaxed executives taking a lunch break in the company cafeteria, but taking their lunch break. In actuality, they were helping the president put the final stamp on a program of action that would bring the e
Barbara, is herself a noted scholar sft kennedy era and clan. Shes also the director of president ial studies here at the Miller Center. She is a very seasoned export, oral historian as well as written historian. And for many years she helped lead the Oral History Program here at the Miller Center which was one of the signature undertakings that we do in interviewing the leading members of president ial administrations from the ford years on up until the present. Or at least i should say the recent past. We have completed oral histories under her leadership and Russell Riley of every administration through the george w. Bush administration and we are planning to lay seeing to the Obama Administration and well find out what the Trump Administration what their attitude is towards being interviewed for oral history when we get to that. In any case, barbara is going to take us forward and ill turn things over to her. Thanks so much, will. And of course to mel and stephanie for conceptualiz
For a twoday conference looking at the complicated history between u. S. And russian leaders over the last century. The focus of this next session is the relationship between john f. Kennedy and Nikita Chrushchev in the 1960s. This is about an hour and ten minutes. Ladies and gentlemen, back to our second panel accessing u. S. Soviet relations in the 1960s and 70s. Im not going to chair the panel, but i will turn the duties over to my colleague here at the Miller Center, professor barbara perry, who is going to anchor the panel. Barbara is herself a noted scholar of the 60s and of the kennedy era and the kennedy clan. Shes also director of president ial studies here at the Miller Center. She is a very seasoned expert oral historian as well as a written historian, and for many years she helped lead the Oral History Program here at the Miller Center, which was one of the signature undertakings that we do in interviewing the leading members of president ial administrations from the ford y
At the Miller Center, professor barbara perry, who is going to anchor the panel. Barbara is herself a noted scholar of the 60s and of the kennedy era and the kennedy clan. She is also the director of president ial studies here at the Miller Center. She is a very seasoned expert oral historian as well as a written historian, and for many years she helped lead the Oral History Program here at the Miller Center, which was one of the signature undertakings that we do in interviewing the leading members of president ial administrations from the four years on up until the present. Or at least i should say the recent past. We have completed oral histories under her leadership and russel rileys leadership of every administration through the george w. Bush administration and we are planning to lay siege to the Obama Administration and well find out what the Trump Administration what their attitude is towards being interviewed about oral history when we get to that place. In any case, barbaras g