the power to hold them to answer before the bar of the national courts for the violation of the oath in the rights of their fellow man. why should it not be so? is the bill of rights here after is in the past five years with 11 states amiri dead letter? bear in ladies and judgment is the bottom line. wyatt joe with this case to get before the supreme court? if the opportunity whether the take it or not to give us her due process clause back. equal protection clause of backup. it is not up to a prosecutor and a judge. a rogue prosecutor edit rogue judge for that matter to destroy and nullify the due process clause of the fifth and 14th amendment. by the equal protection clause of the fifth and 14th amendment. with the same democrat party that rejected the constitution. the same democrat party that fought the due process clause
carolina. that is, the confederacy. what do i mean by that? i am not arguing here or there will be a violent civil war. i do not know what comes, nobody does fit what i m arguing is the civil war was about slavery and about the attack on the constitution and the attack on the union, the nation. what took place in that courtroom the jury should never have been impaneled. eight soros prosecutor and abided judge in effect decided they were going to launch a war against our constitutional construct. how so? nullifying due process clause of the constitution of the fifth amendment nullifying the due process clause that applies to the states through one of the post- civil war amendments. the 14th amendment. and if this stands very dire for the constitution. let me put it to you this way.
carolina. that is, the confederacy. what do i mean by that? i am not arguing here or there will be a violent civil war. i do not know what comes, nobody does fit what i m arguing is the civil war was about slavery and about the attack on the constitution and the attack on the union, the nation. what took place in that courtroom the jury should never have been impaneled. eight soros prosecutor and abided judge in effect decided they were going to launch a war against our constitutional construct. how so? nullifying due process clause of the constitution of the fifth amendment nullifying the due process clause that applies to the states through one of the post- civil war amendments. the 14th amendment. and if this stands very dire for the constitution. let me put it to you this way.
the power to hold them to answer before the bar of the national courts for the violation of the oath in the rights of their fellow man. why should it not be so? is the bill of rights here after is in the past five years with 11 states amiri dead letter? bear in ladies and judgment is the bottom line. wyatt joe with this case to get before the supreme court? if the opportunity whether the take it or not to give us her due process clause back. equal protection clause of backup. it is not up to a prosecutor and a judge. a rogue prosecutor edit rogue judge for that matter to destroy and nullify the due process clause of the fifth and 14th amendment. by the equal protection clause of the fifth and 14th amendment. with the same democrat party that rejected the constitution. the same democrat party that fought the due process clause