Do more pretty sure placed like south of market we need to see more housing commissioner moore. Im interested in the legislation it adds one more tool into the castro legislation this one compliments others its not up to us to comment on the desire for all to have it served up at once but leave it up for a fire chief discussion it makes me feel comfortable. I want to enlightenment you on the authorness when we look at the remarkable piece of work ive not seen this as a at a level of using the method doing youll see where it will happen and the results. So to staff and to you this is a good piece of work im comfortable with that. Commissioner antonini yeah. I followup on what commissioner borden said whenever we can look at the situation existing now for unite that are inclusionary at the 12 percent by state law it probably would be good to study what could be implemented as some sort of bonus for complying and help our legislation especially, if it gets challenged by someone who didnt
Know, file for a project application and say i want to increase the state law technically. I believe the developer could make a contention but i dont want to opine on that. Sorry christian staff if the developer wants to get a bulgsz request the state law spells it out and a bunch of progress to go to throw a special district with we have to apply and go through for entitlement for a lot of the affordability projects so the project sponsors. Thats for one hundred percent of Affordable Housing projects. Right so we will expand the program and spell out the steps that have a telephone or 20 percent level of fooblts as well. I think given theres already a state law it makes sense we kind of create a standard by which we could move forward with prop c we reduce the be affordability but this could help for the creation of more unit do i think thousands of developers are going to do it no. If new york is an example there might be a few people but were not changing the height and bulk and all
Been great about it but mr. Ram can elaborate i can ice this one we actually have a sdrugs discussion if the developers provide affordable units were allowed to give them more density but we have the inclusionary housing requirement we are looking at brown where it might happen and thats sort of thing but that housing density law has been in place for a number of years and were looking at to implement it. It doesnt actually have a threshold number obviously to be implemented thats the difference here couldnt the dispensary theoretically, you know, file for a project application and say i want to increase the state law technically. I believe the developer could make a contention but i dont want to opine on that. Sorry christian staff if the developer wants to get a bulgsz request the state law spells it out and a bunch of progress to go to throw a special district with we have to apply and go through for entitlement for a lot of the affordability projects so the project sponsors. Thats
Know, file for a project application and say i want to increase the state law technically. I believe the developer could make a contention but i dont want to opine on that. Sorry christian staff if the developer wants to get a bulgsz request the state law spells it out and a bunch of progress to go to throw a special district with we have to apply and go through for entitlement for a lot of the affordability projects so the project sponsors. Thats for one hundred percent of Affordable Housing projects. Right so we will expand the program and spell out the steps that have a telephone or 20 percent level of fooblts as well. I think given theres already a state law it makes sense we kind of create a standard by which we could move forward with prop c we reduce the be affordability but this could help for the creation of more unit do i think thousands of developers are going to do it no. If new york is an example there might be a few people but were not changing the height and bulk and all
The disgraced mayor, oncamera smoking crack cocaine downtown with a mistress, marion barry jr. Led a controversial career. I dont know why you are here but thank you for coming. Maybe the 2 but could make this more affordable. We will stick to the budget. As we are supposed to do. I worked for chris a lot over the years, we were on the supercommittee which ended up not being so super but it was a serious effort to find answert. Some of what we propose you could argue later happened through sequestration, we did not get at this broader picture of how to deal with the biggest part of the budget and two sense of the budget which is called mandatory spending within ten years, the Nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office tells us it will be three quarters of the budget so that is the biggest part of the dget out for us but again Chris Van Hollen and i have worked together before and hopefully we will Work Together in the future to find Common Ground on this and other issues. The debt we curr