Or inexplicable sudden selloffs, including nasty ones like today, where the dow lost 274 points, second worst day of the year for the two averages, and nasdaq third worst lets tick off the possible reasons why we might have gotten slammed today so you can get a handle on whats happening and more importantly whats going to happen thats what matters. First, the most obvious reason has to do, yes, indeed, with our president. If you believe the huge rally in the stock market since the election has been all about trump, then you might have been jarred into selling in the last few days theres also the narrative of a ceo president , to bolster American Industrial might. As of yesterday, that latter narrative, its out the window the president badly misjudged the ceos who stepped down from his panel. The execs stuck with their values i talked with a lot of ceos. Most of the ones i spoke to believe that the president implicitly backed the kkk, and the neonazis, against a group of charlottesville
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions
The rule proposal is 75 pages the preamble trying to describe the proposed rule was actually longer than the rule itself. Where do you see that i know that a number of organizations, a number of folks from arizona were a state thats very entrepreneurial and trying to desperately bring in capital and are worried about the sort of tax treatments underlying. I know im getting a little technical, but first where do you see these rule mechanics . Congressman, we issued the 385 rule as part of our effort to make it harder for u. S. Companies to invert, to take u. S. Companies and change the address and avoid u. S. Tax liability. The reason the preamble was a bit lengthy is we raised a number of questions that we wanted to get comment on, so we werent surprised that issues were raised. We raised the issues themselves in the preamble. While we got hundreds of comments, it all comes down to six issues, which we have worked hard at addressing. The purpose of the rule which was to stop inversions