Page 6 - Objective Evidence News Today

Novembers 2012 election. according to a massachusetts institute of technology analysis, black and hispanic voters waited nearly twice as long to vote as whites. the long election day lines around florida may have turned away more than 200,000 frustrated would-be voters who gave up and went home before they cast ballots or saw the lines that were hours long and decided not to join them according to data collected by the "orlando sentinel". florida governor rick scott slashed early voting from 14 ...

Think is not unreasonable. >> but if senator paul is looking for evidence, he need not look any further than last novembers 2012 election. according to a massachusetts institute of technology analysis, black and hispanic voters waited nearly twice as long to vote as whites. the long election day lines around florida may have turned away more than 200,000 frustrated would-be voters who gave up and went home before they cast ballots or saw the lines that were hours long and decided not to join the...

Disenfranchisement around voter suppression seems like maybe not the best area to sort of kick off your -- the beginning of your national candidacy, if you want to call it that. >> yes, if youre looking at yourself as someone who could be a national presidential candidate. but if youre someone whos thinking i want to get the nomination, this is perfect. because there are a lot of people within the republican base who think that there is this ongoing scheme out there by people of color, african-a...

She committed perjury. she admitted lying under oath and very disrespectful and announced one of the jurors was retarded and announced she wasnt coming back the next day to testify. she wasnt credible because the objective evidence showed she didnt deserve the jurys respect in general. i thought she was credible in terms of being herself but if ever a witness dismissed and commits to committing perjury and admitting to doing what she said she did and what a child, much less 19, in a court of law...

Defense being questioned. this is redirect examination by defense attorney. >> whether they saw the actual moment when the shot was fired. >> that is correct, sir. i have to interrupt the objective evidence. im not going to base my opinion on the witnesses because witnesses are wrong all the time. >> have you had occasion where you have reviewed witness statements, people who have claimed to have seen something with their own eyes that was absolutely contradicted by the physical evidence that yo...

Evaluated the objective evidence in regards to this account thats being presented here. >> i interrupted you. i apologize. >> no, thats fine. >> let me know. i also told the court reporter i would be slow, so if you you can do the same thing, she needs to get everything down. when we are talking to each other, make sure we dont talk over each other. >> yes, sir. >> am i correct in stating that you have always believed that the first statement is the most accurate statement? >> the first statemen...

Prepares for the first full day of testimony tomorrow. i am joined by veteran prosecutor paul henderson, contributor goldie taylor and columnist. paul, i want to start with you. what should we expect next week as the defense begins to make its case? what are you going to be listening for? >> is that to me? >> yes. >> i just got audio. i am looking for the defense to come in and try to attack all of the evidence that they have heard this week that the prosecution has put on. they started off by p...

The things we can see with our own eyes. that is objective and i think that the state of florida as well as the defense lawyers should focus on the objective evidence and i believe the jury can make the decision for them themselves. we only askd that it we a fair process to both the victims family and the defendant and if that is the case everybody can live with it. >> megyn: you won most of the motions. the prosecution which is sort of our side won most of the motions. i want to ask you this. w...

Court because he told an untruth or misled the court when it was concerning him getting out of jail. the question for the jury is will this person tell an untruth or mislead the court to not go to prison. i think that is certainly something thats going to be very relevant in this trial. we heard objective evidence of him pursuing trayvon martin. >> when he says he was just following to see where he was going, but he wasnt pursuing him. i mean how do you make a self-defense claim if you were told...

Real motive is to turn this evidence over right now and some would say its a prejudice the jury. >> its to prejudice the jury? >> yeah. >> explain what you mean by that. >> some people may see this as a very cunning attempt to put this out in front of the general public and the general public is where the jury pool for this case is going to come from. so the defense may be hoping that this is going to potentially sway a jury pool into disliking or finding the victim in this case to be unlikable ...