Page 272 - Observer News Today

That we would necessarily have gone so hard on him if he had just put his arm around a man. so hard on him if he had ust put his arm around a man._ so hard on him if he had ust put his arm around a man. david, you are noddinu. his arm around a man. david, you are nodding- the — his arm around a man. david, you are nodding. the front _ his arm around a man. david, you are nodding. the front pages _ his arm around a man. david, you are nodding. the front pages are - his arm around a man. david, ...

Cummings. yes, when we reflect back on what dominic— cummings. yes, when we reflect back on what dominic cummings _ cummings. yes, when we reflect back on what dominic cummings was - cummings. yes, when we reflect back| on what dominic cummings was saying during that hearing three weeks ago, this is what i was saying about it lots of factors coalescing. here, yet again, is an example of a point where matt hancock should have been sacked and wasnt. what number does that make it? 17 occasions on...

Gina coladangelo in his ministerial office last month. it leads its sunday edition with the headline: "matt finished." it labels the former minister a "hypocrite" over his breach of social distancing guidance, and reports that mr hancock and his wife of 15 years, martha, have split following the revelations. i missed that pun, roger, thank you for pointing it out. humiliated hancock quits — is how the sunday times reports the story. pretty straightforward. the paper says details of mr hancocks...

The writing on the wall. what i think is really interesting is that the judgment of the prime minister was off on this because remember, yesterday, we were told it was case closed. matt hancock would keep his job. nothing to see here. everybody move on. and what i think thats an interesting glimpse into, i think the sort of prime ministers judgment on this, as it was with dominic cummings, isjust judgment on this, as it was with dominic cummings, is just sort of slightly off. you know when somet...

Survived and indeed flourished under borisjohnson. kind of as an observer, what with a sort of political qualities he had, until perhaps the last few weeks? itruiheh perhaps the last few weeks? when matt hancock _ perhaps the last few weeks? when matt hancock started, _ perhaps the last few weeks? when matt hancock started, when - perhaps the last few weeks? when matt hancock started, when i - perhaps the last few weeks? izflj�*té�*i matt hancock started, when i first knew him around 2010,...

These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing or observer misperception and require additional analysis. this recently-declassified video from a navy fighter jet six years ago off the coast of florida reignited the publics interest in ufos. >> my god. >> were going against the wind. thats 120 knots to the. [laughter] >> oh, my gosh, dude -- [inaudible conversations] >> reporter: texas congressman brian babbin weighed in. >> im of the opinion that as the report says, we dont h...

Hello and welcome to our look ahead to what the papers will be bringing us tomorrow. with me are the evening standard columnist and times radio presenter ayesha hazarika and the conservative commentator tim montgomerie. a warm welcome to both of them. lets take a look at tomorrows front pages. almost only one story. as you can expect, the news of matt hancocks resignation as health secretary dominates most of tomorrows front pages. the observer leads with the headline "hancock quits after a day ...

Inconclusive. the u.s. government had as little explanation for the sightings. they warn the unidentified objects clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to u.s. national security. these observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing or observer misperception and require rigorous reanalysis. this off the flight of a jet renewed interest in ufo. >> theyre going against the winds, 120. and oh, my gosh. wow. >> okay. >> texas congressman brian babin weighed in. >...

Statements on his radio program and elsewhere that were similar to the very statements hes now being suspended for. basically, they got fed up. they didnt trust him not to continue to do this. >> because some of the false statements they pinned on him today were false statements, false representations he made to the court, sort of as a non lawyer, to me as just an observer raised a question of why he wasnt facing sanction. why instead of this kind of a license action, why he hasnt faced sanction...

I have never heard of it happening in a case of false statements under these various rules, but the court ruled, but the record they made is pretty strong. its a very serious set of charges. and they made pretty clear that they believe that theres an ongoing threat to the public interest. frankly, during the pendency of this exact motion when his lawyers were litigating it, he was making statements on his radio program and elsewhere that were similar to the very statements that he is now being s...