Page 386 - Observer News Today

The white house circle who were in position to have leaked this. maybe there was a product of a fight within the white house of people who wanted flynn out. i dont know. mr. gowdy didnt know. and i think the committee gop needs to be careful because that trail could lead them back to the white house. >> just briefly, were you pleased with how today went? just watching it as an observer, it did feel that there were two different committees, one republicans focusing on leaks, democrats focusing on...

The sources may be in trumps own white house. so mr. gowdy could just as well have said did steve bannon know about this, did the white house know about this. he could have named anyone in the presidents circle who were equally in a position to have leaked this and maybe this was a product of an internason scene in the white house. i do think the committee gop need to be careful. >> just very briefly, were you pleased with to you pod went? just watching it as an observer, it did feel like there ...

>> as an evenhanded observer, he was protecting the law? siding with the less powerful side than the powerful corporate entity? >> tucker: he did side with the less powerful person. the greens as you know are reviled by most people. if you were to do a poll saying are you sympathetic to hobby lobby or the federal government? i bet it would be 90/10, theres no more unfashionable person than the plaintiffs in this cas case. >> who has the power to fire him who? if you think the employers and ceos ...

>> as an evenhanded observer, he was protecting the law? siding with the less powerful side than the powerful corporate entity? >> tucker: he did side with the less powerful person. the greens as you know are reviled by most people. if you were to do a poll saying are you sympathetic to hobby lobby or the federal government? i bet it would be 90/10, theres no more unfashionable person than the plaintiffs in this case. >> who has the power to fire him who? if you think the employers and ceos are ...

>> if he was just interpreting the law as an evenhanded observer, he might have found an opportunity to side with the less powerful person, the working person, instead of withi the powerful corporate interests. >> tucker: he did side with the less powerful person. the greens as you know are reviled by people. including you and hollywood andd hillary clinton. if you were to do a poll saying are you sympathetic to hobby lobby or the federal government? i bet it would be 90/10, theres no more unfas...

Freedom restoration act of 1993. >> as an evenhanded observer, he was protecting the law? siding with the less powerful side than the powerful corporate entity? >> tucker: he did side with the less powerful person. the greens as you know are reviled by most people. if you were to do a poll saying are you sympathetic to hobby lobby or the federal government? i bet it would be 90/10, theres no more unfashionable person than the plaintiffs in this cas case. >> who has the power to fire him who? if ...

Reasonable, objective observer would conclude as does the court that the stated secular purpose of the executive order is at the very least, secondary to a religious objective of temporarily suspending the entry of muslims. and he used the presidents own words against him, like this statement from the campaign trail. >> donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states. >> reporter: this from surrogate, rudy giuliani. >> he called me up, and said ...

United states and both judges reference that and other comments by some of his advisors at the time such as former new york major rudy guliani. the judge in the maryland case, for instance said "the national security purpose is not the primary purpose of the travel ban." in his ruling in hawaii, judge watson said "any reasonable objective observer would conclude as does the court for purposes of the instant motion for temporary restraining order that the stated secular purpose of the executive o...

A convincing case that the purpose of the second executive order remains the realization of thlong-envisioned muslim ban." while hawaii yesterday, u.s. district judge jarrett watson grand add temporary restraining order for the same reasons. writing "a reasonable objective observer enlighted by the specific historical context, contemporary public statements and specific sequence of its events leading to its issuance would conclude the executive order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a parti...

On issuing visas from six countries amounted to religious discrimination. the judge says he cannot turn a blind eye to mr. trumps statements during the campaign calling for a ban on all muslim immigration. the judge says any reasonable objective observer would conclude that the travel restrictions were drawn up to disfavor a particular religion. he says the reason the government gave protecting national security is secondary to the purpose of blocking the entry of muslims. so for now nothing cha...