Page 2 - Obviously Brian News Today

Court and to hell with the obligations to the rule of law that they would, instead, try to sneak it out in order to put political pressure on the justices and intimidate them into changing their vote. it is shameful. look, im glad that whoopi is back on tv after having to step off for a while for her anti-semitic comments but, you know, maybe she should recognize that destroying the supreme court and the rule of law, thats not nothing. that actually is what protects our liberty in this country. ...

Actually reading this either way i am humbled and shocked. you were a big part of it you gave me time on the show and here we are again. thank you so much. >> brian: its especially and shows you can overcome anything and accountable in life. the best is yet to come. thanks, tyrus. >> thank you. >> brian: another wild day in the johnny depp trial. amber heard took the stand. hear her side of the story next. ♪ ♪ ♪ birds flyin high ♪ ♪ you know how i feel ♪ (coughing) ♪ breeze driftin...

Document says about taking a womans rights away and more focused on who leaks it. im so much less concerned with who leaked this than what was in the leak. and i think. >> [applause] >> i think republicans and conservatives have been working for 50 years. >> yes. >> for this. and now they are playing victim. now they are crying out who leaked it? who leaked it? this is what they have wanted. and i think our reaction needs to be who cares about who leaked it? we care about what was leaked. the su...

What happened in china when the pope was allowing the chinese communist party to pick their bishops. thats what i was arguing against. i wanted him to be a moral light to the world and he refused to meet with me simply because i had called out that desperate need for the chinese people to have religious freedom in their country and not let the catholic church to be co-opted by the communist. to say see what he said about nato and the west about freedom-loving rights respecting people and this au...

Justices, and their law clerks. each justice has four clerks so thats 36 law clerks. and there are a handful of clerical assistants and secretaries who might have it. i think the chances are zero that it is a justice. i cannot believe any justice would be part to such a grave betrayal of the institution. i there it is a law clerk and very like lay law clerk for one of the three liberal justices, that means there are 12 likely suspects. listen, the fact that we have someone willing to be unethica...