Page 9 - Office Practice News Today

Hearing chavez and nona madam clerk, any announcements . Yes and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Items acted upon today will be 0 on the june 8th agenda call item 3. The street name change the recognition of the dr. Tom what so proudly we hailed at the twilights last gleaming . A place. Supervisor kim is the author. Yes. Were excited about this in light of pride weekend coming up but unfortunately, the family mr. Taylor the daughter wasnt able to attend ...

Of law is based on an analysis. And then same page line 13. Let attorney and the ceo. We would add that attorney and the ceo have each made a contact specifying that the contact made a contact as well. I think thats it. With those pardon me . [inaudible] for Public Comment on this issue. I just want to get the motion. Okay. Then we will [inaudible] i will accept the changes. Okay. All right. Now Public Comment on the motion . Sorry about the interruption guys. Good evening. I am jonathan [inaudi...

On is peaking order. I want to thank our clerk andrea and also our staff at the sfgovtv for broadcasting this hearing chavez and nona madam clerk, any announcements . Yes and similar soundproducing Electronic Devices are prohibited at this meeting. Items acted upon today will be 0 on the june 8th agenda call item 3. The street name change the recognition of the dr. Tom what so proudly we hailed at the twilights last gleaming . A place. Supervisor kim is the author. Yes. Were excited about this i...

Second . Commissioner andrews seconds the motion. Im sorry mr. Chair i just want to say there are a couple of tiny little edits that are sort of non substantive in nature that are grammatical changes, so i guess we could either [inaudible] read them quickly, so page one line eight instead of referencing an entity we would reference a person because for a lobbyist employer thats how we designated them as a person, not an entity so for consistency sake. Okay. Page three line 17 multiple copies. Th...

Staff and the proposed regulation states that there should be an itemization of each contributor of over 100 that is given as a result of the lobbyists fundraising appeal. We suggest that the approach be taken that thats not the approach taken but the [inaudible] standard used and instead of listing each individual contributor the date is given so if you do a fundraising event and responsible for 10 people contributing 500 the event shows 5,000 from the lobbyist to the specific candidate. We bel...

Motion to table this item. Without objection this item is tabled. Madam clerk is there any other items before us today. That concludes our items for today. Okay this meeting is adjourned thank you. Good morning and welcome to the board of supervisors San Francisco Land Use Economic Development committee im scott wiener little chair tomato is supervisor jane kim and our supervisor cowen will be here mom will i ill note were not in our standard room this is the temporary room theres a lot going on...

Sunshine ordinance and of the brown act and as a result shouldnt be included. Now, the other thing i would like to mention sort of irrespective of this were talking about lobbyists meeting in private with employees of the city and we can have discussions about levels and all this other stuff. Why are they having private meetings anyway . Why dont they submit a memorandum to explain the ideas so members of the public can put a request in to see what theyre arguing and see what is a counter argume...

Instead of listing each individual contributor the date is given so if you do a fundraising event and responsible for 10 people contributing 500 the event shows 5,000 from the lobbyist to the specific candidate. We believe should should be done and effectuates the policy and not over burden the requirements. The real intent of the law is ensure that the public is aware of any possible undue influence that occurs between a lobbyist and an Office Holder or candidate and that will be clearly shown ...

The issue regarding the actual way that lobbyist fundraising activity would be reported. Right now the recommendation by staff and the proposed regulation states that there should be an itemization of each contributor of over 100 that is given as a result of the lobbyists fundraising appeal. We suggest that the approach be taken that thats not the approach taken but the [inaudible] standard used and instead of listing each individual contributor the date is given so if you do a fundraising event...

Possible difficulties that have to be met i think its fairly comprehensive, and i would move it. Second . Commissioner andrews seconds the motion. Im sorry mr. Chair i just want to say there are a couple of tiny little edits that are sort of non substantive in nature that are grammatical changes, so i guess we could either [inaudible] read them quickly, so page one line eight instead of referencing an entity we would reference a person because for a lobbyist employer thats how we designated them...