Latest Breaking News On - Ohioans against corporate bailouts - Page 4 : vimarsana.com
The American Petroleum Institute gave nearly $1 5M to help block House Bill 6 nuclear bailout
daily-jeff.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from daily-jeff.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The American Petroleum Institute gave nearly $1 5M to help block House Bill 6 nuclear bailout
lancastereaglegazette.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from lancastereaglegazette.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
The American Petroleum Institute gave nearly $1 5M to help block House Bill 6 nuclear bailout
zanesvilletimesrecorder.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from zanesvilletimesrecorder.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Oil and gas group gave nearly $1 5M to help block House Bill 6 nuclear bailout
msn.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from msn.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
April 21, 2020 Last July, Ohio’s governor signed House Bill 6 (HB6) to provide FirstEnergy (now Energy Harbor), a large electric utility, with subsidies of nearly $150 million per year to keep its Perry and Davis-Besse nuclear power plants operating. Ohio is only the fifth US state to offer such subsidies; other states include New York, Illinois, New Jersey, and Connecticut. Although the subsidies are justified by some as necessary for climate mitigation, in the latter four states, electricity generation from natural gas, which results in greenhouse gas emissions, has increased since 2017, when these subsidy programs started kicking in. Moreover, in Ohio, subsidies are also being extended to coal power plants, providing the clearest illustration that what underlies the push for subsidies to nuclear plants is not a result of a real commitment to climate mitigation but a way to use climate concerns to bolster the profits of some energy corporations.