Page 70 - Omissions News Today

Blind spot. >> bret: john, thank you. stocks were up today. the dow gained 34. the s&p 500. the nasdaq grossed 32. "the new york times" is blaming an editing error for the glaring omissions of accusations against supreme court justice, kavanaug kavanaugh. backing away from talk of impeaching the justice, one house lawmaker is going through with that effort. howard kurtz has the latest. >> with "the new york times" facing mounting criticism over its story on brett kavanaugh that had to be correct...

Here, and it really shocks the conscience of journalists especially, you know, i have been in this field for a decade now, and the first thing thats you learn is, you have three sources. you have to verify all of the evidence that you obtain from the sources. you have to triple check, double check. what "the new york times" has done is absolutely outlandish. therew is a serious concern hee because those purposeful omissions in "the new york times" actually is all the proof that anyone needs, and...

>> who came to you? how did this come to pass? >> the folks at every town for gun safety organized this and helped out by levi strauss. a lot of companies have stood up and said ceos have a voice in this debate. asked us to sign on and we agreed to add our voice. >> there are some notable omissions in terms of big ceos, well-known brands that did not sign on. apple, facebook, google, jpmorgan, wells fargo. why wouldnt they, do you think? >> i cant really speak as to why other companies didnt. bu...

They absolutely knew that simpson had been hired by the dnc and the clinton campaign. they said that steele was credible. they knew by the time of the first fisa application that he had talked about the existence of a russian consulate in miami that did not exist. david: right. >> so in fact they knew that he wasnt credible so all of these things will go into the mix when they decide whether or not the misrepresentations to the fisa court, which there unquestionably were, and the omissions, whet...

>> debates are widely watched. we are seeing many watching the fireworks. bernie sanders raked in $1.1 million since the first debate this week. fast balls you saw there, former congressman john delaney, he may have started from a pretty low floor to be honest, but he is now touting a 2000% increase in online donations. marian williamsons campaign said she logged the largest day of donations since the campaign launched. they didnt give dollar amounts, but donations exceeded all our expectatio...

Chief of staff said this is a bout changing the entire economy and all you have to do is look with the green new deal does to that. i asked, for what? they are talking about outlawing and eliminating major industries in the united states and for what? because america only makes up a small portion of the global omissions worldwide and so would democrats essentially are asking us to do is to walk our economy off a cliff and who do you think is going to be the beneficiary of that? its going to be c...

Ladies and gentlemen, we are now going to read your verdict. please listen carefully to the verdict as its read because once the verdict is read each of you will be asked whether this is, in fact, your verdict." and then the court clerk says, "will the defendant please rise and face the jury." the defendant rises and faces the jury and then the clerk reads from the verdict form. "we, the jury, unanimously find the defendant, bijan kian guilty avenue conspiracy to act as an unregistered agent of ...

Have. the judge, is it unanimous? the foreperson, yes, sir. the judge, have you completed the verdict form? the foreperson, yes. the judge, would you give it to mr. burns, please? the court clerk. the verdict form is given to the court clerk. the judge, all right. ladies and gentlemen, we are now going to read your verdict. please listen carefully to the verdict as its read because once the verdict is read each of you will be asked whether this is, in fact, your verdict. and then the court clerk...

To the republicans to at least expose that in the nature of how they handle the questioning of mr. mueller. would you not agree, matt? >> i would. we have to do more than just question robert mueller. we have to expose the bias investigation that was run and expose the substantial omissions in the mueller report. there were factual mistakes. people that had ties to the u.s. state department and western intelligence who were identified as only having ties to russian intelligence. and there were c...

That he will play it tight, this is a man with a agenda and its to the republicans to at least expose that in the nature of how they handle the questioning of mr. mueller. would you not agree, matt? >> i would. we have to do more than just question robert mueller. we have to expose the bias investigation that was run and expose the substantial omissions in the mueller report. there were factual mistakes. people that had ties to the u.s. state department and western intelligence who were identifi...