this step, and this is why this is connected to the institutions and values that we all cherish as americans. and also, he made up and make sure to really backup the people who are working in that building. he talked about the fact that they are facing attacks, the fbi, and the department justice officials, and he came out and call them unpatriotic. so that was merrick garland going to the rank and file, saying, i have your back on this. and what we hear former president trump attacking you, i want to make sure that there is someone in the public defending you. katie, how could trump and his lawyers do anything but comply tomorrow? since monday, we have heard from mitch mcconnell, down. we need to know what merrick garland was doing, why he was doing, we need transparency. they have been banging on on every possible platform. so narrow merrick garland said, yep, open kimono, let s do this thing. on what grounds can trump possibly say, no, let s keep it between us? well i think that
before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much for before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much for bringing before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much for bringing us i before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much for bringing us up i before it happened. chi-chi, thank you so much for bringing us up to. you so much for bringing us up to date. just outside the mar a lago residence behind her. joining us from washington is randall eliason, a former federal prosecutor. let s start at the beginning. help us understand, when it comes to these kind of search warrants, on what grounds are they issued? so the rocedure what grounds are they issued? so the procedure is what grounds are they issued? so the procedure is that what grounds are they issued? so the procedure is that law what grounds are they issued? so the procedure is that law enforcement i procedure is that law enforcement have to go to a judge or a magistrate and es
in the rwandan capital, kigali, at the commonwealth heads of government meeting in ten days time. it follows an attempt to block a flight taking asylum seekers to rwanda next tuesday which was rejected by the courts. we are joined byjames wilson, who is deputy director of the campaign group, detention care. thanks for being with us. i haven t spoken to you on a channel since the announcement byjudge swift that they were rejecting the call for a stay on this flight. but the groups are going back to court on monday. 0n are going back to court on monday. on what grounds? on what grounds? thank you very much. on what grounds? thank you very much- good on what grounds? thank you very much. good to on what grounds? thank you very much. good to speak on what grounds? thank you very much. good to speak to on what grounds? thank you very much. good to speak to you. - on what grounds? thank you very much. good to speak to you. just| on what grounds? thank you very l much. good to speak
said yeah we have got to provide security for supreme court you have been js. in the house nancy pelosi is actually saying no. on what grounds is it okay to reject secret service for the supreme court justices? it is not okay. there is no excuse to not provide protection for all the justices put out these decisions on whether the laws passed in this country are constitutional or not. this is a no-brainer. it should not be a partisan issue. shame on nancy pelosi for turning it into a partisan issue. look how close this threat was, again, thank goodness and we credit law enforcement and i m sure the kavanaugh family is grateful to law enforcement. we need to stop this encouragement of any type of targeting on any of our supreme court justices and they need to absolutely have adequate
exemption, whether it s because he had covid recently he obvious he hadn t had covid recently he obvious he hadn t been had covid recently he obvious he hadn t been vaccinated before, otherwise he is still not be vaccinated. so is clearly not been vaccinated vaccinated. so is clearly not been vaccinated. and yes, he s got this medicat vaccinated. and yes, he s got this medical exemption, but we don t know on what medical exemption, but we don t know on what grounds, and presumably he s presented on what grounds, and presumably he s presented - on what grounds, and presumably he s presented the assumption would be he s had presented the assumption would be he s had a presented the assumption would be he s had a friendly doctors somewhere not in australia who provided somewhere not in australia who provided evidence to say he s got grounds provided evidence to say he s got grounds for exemption. the independent panel has approved it, presumably, and peopl