Of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to remind them that this sort of anti building action we are taking Public Comment on the items being proposed for continuance. This is jet this is not general Public Comment period that will come up shortly. Okay. Commissioner moore. Im sorry, moved to continue. On that motion to continue items one and two acknowledge the wi
Item a1, 2017008431drp 2220 turk boulevard near the corner of nido avenue; lot 032 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of Building Permit application no. 2017. 0612. 9029 for the addition of three accessory dwelling units within the existing item a2, 2017008412drp. 2230 turk boulevard at the corner of nido avenue; lot 033 in assessors block 1112. Request for discretionary review of continuance. Item 8a, at 550 tenth avenue has been with ron. Item 8b, at 550 tenth avenue, the variance proportion is proposed for continuance to september 25. I have no other items proposed for continuance and no speaker cards. When anyone from the public like to comment on these items . Come on up. Right now we are only taking comments on the matter of the continuance itself. Wanted to say, im a resident here in San Francisco, i am the bishop. I know that there are people that are against building, and construction of Housing Units for families here in San Francisco. I just want to re
We were to have a Third Party Consultant because of the proposed building a potential contributor we are working closely with the team and very please line up on the screen side of the room pleased with the final design we feel it is a strong proposal are more conceptual with the fabric of the existing neighborhood the project present logic challenges a muni elevators on the premises and a muni escalator the tunnel in addition weve agreed were feasible to widen the 14th street sidewalk and setback our building 7 feet from the corner that adds better pedestrian assess around the building is an actual corner with the Church Street as well i have presented to numerous neighborhood groups including getting the support of Castro District and castro merchant and the coalition we presented twice to theyre not currently supportive we fully supported the properties on the immediate west they wrote and letter and support the project in any historical of history it is unusual and jeff mentioned o
Additional Public Comment . Open this item . Okay Public Comment is closed. And opening up to commissioners commissioner antonini. This as a very good project and for my purposes consider sacramento a designation a number of stores and restaurant and other things i will go to sacramento for i dont live neighborhood nor is my business in that neighborhood that in and of itself it sounds like a very good improvement restoring the windows and making that assessable to two different ways it will make a more attractive frontage and potential for quite a few of the jobs and i witnessed this all the time where people i know will drive out of San Francisco for a particular product or service and saving 2 thousand people if driving to palo alto is good in keeping tax revenue in San Francisco so i think this is a very good and their also making street tree improvements and staff has already opined this is a retail are accessory so i think i mean there was one speaker that brought that up if that
Be used even for short periods of time. Where its supporting biofuel. We believe to use it and we absolutely will if we can. There was also a vibration issue. We are exploring the possibility of putting the generator on spring isolate oris for the mechanical equipment and specifically for the exhaust the biofuel would be one way to dramatically reduce the particulate. So you think thats quite probable that you can do that instead of diesel which is probably already being used . Yes. And maintaining the equipment itself with regular maintenance will operate more efficiently. And generally with the noise. If there is any from the operation in its normal usage. There appears to be two main sources of noise. That was the mechanical equipment on the roof and we investigated that and inspected it and appeared to be mounted incorrectly and older equipment. We are going to be replacing that equipment and putting isolate ors on the new equipment on the roof to reduce that vibration. There was a