Page 51 - Open Question News Today

SEC proposed new rules and amendments to existing rules under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended that would have notable practical implications for private fund advisers, in many cases, regardless of the adviser's registration status.

SEC proposed new rules and amendments to existing rules under the U.S. Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended that would have notable practical implications for private fund advisers, in many cases, regardless of the adviser's registration status.

Attorney general garland, as i think the questions get more and more pointed and pregnant in terms of whether or not anyone who planned the overthrow of the government is going to face any reckoning for it in criminal law. so thats wednesday. open question, potentially to be answered by the attorney general on that day. were also right now still waiting on the department of justice to decide whether theyre going to prosecute criminal contempt charges against trumps white house chief of staff mar...

0 they are going to put down and lay down the law to. it >> not there yet. >> its coming, dont worry. im in communication with their kids on. this dont worry. planning the and thanks to you at home for joining us at this hour, happy new year to you as well, good to have you back with us. in washington, d.c., they celebrated the first day after the holiday by getting a huge pile of snow dumped on the capitol cap capito capital city and shutting down most of the federal government because of it....

>> i think its really important to both be very clear about what the science says and what the implications are. if youre fully vaccinated and boosted, you may get a break breakthrough infection but it should be mild. the question is how much milder is it for the unvaccinated person? the data suggestions people unvaccinated are getting sick at a pretty high rate. if you are unvaccinated, i would not take comfort that this virus is mild, somewhat milder. khat ooe hochel said over 5,500 hospital...

Be on his side. in part because he installed three of those nine justices during his presidency. trump has a very transactional view of judiciary and in particular of the supreme court. and he believes that because he nominated these individuals to be justices of the highest court of the land that they owe him a favor or two or three and so i think hes counting on the court to intervene here, to have his back and keep the national archives from releasing the documents that trump doesnt want this...

Records. you know, he does not want them to have those records. so it raises the question, i think, for members of the committee what exactly is he hiding if hes not going to furnish the documentation requested of him. >> he organizes they lack the authority to obtain the reports from jpmorgan. is this a delay tactic or could this hold up in court? >> they cooperate to an extent, he has here, and by the way, it looks like from what the committee said that he somehow got $200,000 were a source wi...

Former white house staffers like mark meadows, former allies like the president like steve bannon and jeffrey clark. we dont know how they will deal with sitting members. thats the open question here is how far they will go to actually get that information and if they could subpoena sitting lawmakers. >> that definitely seems to be a stickier situation. harry, final thought here. what are you going to be watching for in the new year and what do you think will signal that the investigation is ent...

If this does stretch past the mid terms, thats the ball game right there. that has always been the former presidents plan here is to tie this up in the courts and thats not a question thats usually answered very quickly once you get into the court system on this. in terms of whats coming, we already know that there are more documents deadlines, even for the first week of january. well also be looking at the january 6th one-year anniversary. well look to see the way that these lawmakers and the c...

Question. i have not seen much data yet that makes me think well need it. i expect this to become an annual booster, sort of like a flu shot. the question is do we need it sooner, at six or nine months? based on everything ive seen so far, im not seeing much in the way of a need for a fourth booster but if the evidence changes, the recommendations will change. if we need it, we have plenty of vaccine and well have capability to do it and if people need it, theyll get it. the data is just not in ...