Page 18 - Page Document News Today

Witnesses and now theyre starting his chapter in the story. maybe they do decide to open it up at this point, because that 123 page document put out by republicans now ensliens ahrine confirms what weve heard from them is that theyre going to look the other way come hell or high water. the idea that you can sit and listen to those two weeks of testimony from nonpartisan officials, many of whom worked in the trump administration, many of whom were appointed by the trump administration and think t...

The democrats, will try to be at these public hearings. that these are people largely who are testifying on a nonpartisan basis. if the reason you would have jim jordan join devin nunes on the intel panel is they are going to push a much different narrative. that these are "never trumpers" that weve heard the president talk about who have an asked like ax to grind or political bias against the president. >> dana: but one of those points that gillian turner -- and shes had 6 minutes to look at a ...

Hearing and that is something that is of note. >> dana: can i interrupt you for a moment? as i was starting to read through this 324 page document which is not easy to do, and just skimming, i noticed right of the top. i think you and i can speculate because they released this and who we are talking about it. but why would that be redacted? is that simply because hes not a member of the committee? >> its not the chip roy part thats redacted, but its the part about reductions. >> dana: i know the...

I hope senator mcconnell and leadership is listening. you have a lot more power than you have let on, maybe thats the way theyre playing it. also breaking tonight, with actual text of the impeachment resolution, they just referred to it, the full house is going to vote on it on thursday. the eight page document basically puts in writing with the dems have already been doing behind closed doors, but as this: it would allow the president or his counsel to participate in impeachment proceedings hel...

Unregulated messy divorce is not an option any more why is. investors are seeing saturdays decision as a setback not necessarily the the end of this discussion so weve seen a lot of banks come out today a lot of analysts are sort of lowering their expectations for a note that goldman sachs now expects only a 5 percent chance of. thats down from 10 percent so a lot of investors are optimistic because they see that this vote on saturday was very close and a lot of a lot of lawmakers were saying th...

Transparency in this system. nobody really knows how medicare for all would roll out but i dont think its a gamble we want to take. steve: sure. one of the reasons that the democrats took the house in the last election was the fact they were talking about the republicans, if they win, they are going to take away your healthcare choices. now, the president is trying to get in front of this. the question is this enough? >> you know, i have watched him. in the very beginning this administration cam...

>> even the nature of the defense weve seen from republicans, republicans are not coming out to actually defend the presidents conduct here. even people who are inclined to be -- theyre lobbing criticism at the democrats, theyre saying i hadnt read it, this only 8 1/2 page document, theyre claiming they havent read it. even mitch mcconnell said he thought it was laughable that this was impeachable. the white house is putting out these talking points and trying to get ahead of this story, saying ...

Vehicle you you should b-- obst. mark: i want to dig in on this one step further. you hear in media and in left and democrats say that but for the two opinions, from officing wellegal counsel that you cant indict a sitting president. they tried to get mueller to say that, but he would not, i have a different take, they fought that they had a -- thought they had a case for obstruction. that 500 page document, that is not really a legal document, it is just a big document. with the kitchen sink. n...

General speaks, he would have firsthand knowledge of the evidence before he speaks and utters a word about whether or not he is going to charge a crime. but this attorney general failed to do it. and clearly, it is because he thinks of himself as the attorney of the president instead of the peoples attorney. and i think thats disqualifying. >> just to put a sharp point on it, it seems to me that he overruled, he overruled mueller. he said basically he cant exonerate the president on obstruction....

That before that attorney general speaks, he would have firsthand knowledge of the evidence before he speaks and utters a word about whether or not he is going to charge a crime. but this attorney general failed to do it. and clearly, it is because he thinks of himself as the attorney of the president instead of the peoples attorney. and i think thats disqualifying. >> just to put a sharp point on it, it seems to me that he overruled, he overruled mueller. he said basically he cant exonerate the...