Page 165 - Parameters News Today

The defendant, but also savings that might intimidate threaten, or otherwise interfere with a witnesss ability to testify freely. a jurors ability to feel they can be partial or to not feel threatened or intimidated for a particular result. the judges been very clear about 2nd, these parameters in an interest of the interest of justice here. and now, the manhattan das office hoping to have and convince the judge that there should be sanctions are consequences. what they say, or at least seven di...

2023 safest year for flying by several parameters: IATA

Because i didnt let you speak. I let you speak, i gave you parameters, you defied the parameters, so now any sort of appeals that you make is going to be in short order. And that is the brilliance of what he decided. Well okay. You know, we had more topics than we have time to cover. So, im going to have to have you all back at some point. Former senator claire mccaskill, ruth benghiat, charles coleman junior, thank you all very much for joining me today. And coming up, with just two days before...

Thats what he did. thats ultimately how donald trump does. and it was smart of judge engoron to do that, because in the long run, it is going to benefit the court. >> and one more real quick question for we have to go. hours before the trial on thursday, police responded to a bomb threat at the judges home on long island. im wondering, do you think that influenced the judge in allowing trump to speak? >> i dont. i think the judge understands that donald trump is going to do whatever he can to av...

Inflated his worth by billions and now hes deciding whether trump should by $370 million which is what the attorney general has been seeking. paula, i mean as all this went down and trump afterwards planned to go in front of those flags and make a statement. but in the courtroom the judge had said trump couldnt speak if he wasnt going to respect the courts parameters and he spoke anyway. was it effective? >> reporter: no, erin, its very unlikely to be legally effective to attack the judge who is...

I think people were basically not confident about the way in which the panel, the panel will reject his claim. mildew a quickly. the exact rationale is a little bit uncertain, i would say. >> just to be clear on the technical renowned meaning. its when the appellate court sends it back down one level. they say we want to reassess this issue but with these parameters. you heard jack smiths attorney say no, thats a terrible idea, lets not open that can of worms. you guys should affirm and then let...

As long as trumps attorneys meet certain conditions. hes already been found liable of fraud, so the court will really be deciding how big of a penalty, he, his family, his company will face. back with us now is former u.s. attorney barbara mcquade. trumps attorneys have to meet certain conditions on the scope and the timing and what is considered permissible for the closing argument. just how unusual and controversial is this idea of trump delivering at least part of his own closing? >> it is an...

Decisions made?— it happened, where any concrete decisions made? ~ . ., ., decisions made? what we have done, we have agreed _ decisions made? what we have done, we have agreed the _ decisions made? what we have done, we have agreed the framework- decisions made? what we have done, we have agreed the framework in - we have agreed the framework in terms of the parameters and what we need to know decide... civil servants and lawyers are going to have to frame the legislation and we are going to ...

Usually thats just the attorneys summing up everything that had been presented at the trial. the judge said, okay, donald trump can speak during these closing arguments if he wants to, but he set some terms. about a week ago, the judge said in an e-mail now publicly available through the court, he nay not seek to introduce new evidence. he may not testify. he may not comment on irrelevant matters in particular and without limitation, he may not deliver a campaign speech. basically donald trump w...

Us adults say donald trump should not have immunity. it goes beyond him. clearly there are supporters of donald trump and the cases hes facing, but on the broader issue of whether a president should have immunity, where do you stand? yeah, its a very thorny _ immunity, where do you stand? yeah, its a very thorny issue _ immunity, where do you stand? yeah, its a very thorny issue and _ immunity, where do you stand? yeah, its a very thorny issue and im - immunity, where do you stand? yeah, its a v...