That to make matters worse junction described those concerns about m. P. Safety as the all in all it was the most angry parliamentary session anyone can remember the government accuses the opposition of running away from an election they say he broke the law rather suspending parliament and fear he might do it again thats to the sense of democracy unraveling the whole thing is a horror show barnsley aljazeera london. And. Theres no purpose but to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible well the latest push for gun restrictions in the us lead to a change in the law. Find out why the cuts are for the world athletics championships. Hello so quieten down weather wise now theres not much in the sky from the point of view daily pretties showers or seasonal rain you might think this looks like the wettest place and it might have been but whats been recorded is in Southern Vietnam and also on the island of sumatra was figures not huge oh thats pretty well its like flash flooding
The surrender acts that language surrendering to europe is used by the far right and many m. P. s have faced Death Threats as a result consequently the atmosphere inside parliament became furious was. Sometime today and if you think i tell the Prime Minister that i didnt quite this month then i will try and change was to meet with moderates how lonely it has to come from the Prime Minister 1st trying to make matters worse junction described those concerns about m. P. Safety as humbug all in all it was the most angry parliamentary session anyone can remember the government accuses the opposition of running away from an election they say he broke the law over suspending parliament and fear he might do it again to the sense of democracy unraveling the whole thing is a harsh. Aljazeera london. Well for more on the forward from the extraordinary scenes in parliament lets cross to westminster and sonia going to go and sonia after last nights drama fortes if anything has changed. Little if an
See is not in his place, but as he is characteristically evasive. It is a bill that effectively ends the negotiations. A bill that demands an extension at least until next year and perhaps for many more years to come. I feel that insists britain acquiesced to the demands of brussels and hands control to our partners in a bill designed to overturn the biggest democratic vote in our history. It is therefore a film without precedent in the history of this house, seeking as it does to force the Prime Minister with a predrafted letter to surrender in international negotiations. I refuse to do this, mr. Speaker. It is clear there is only one way forward the only one way forward for this country. The house has voted repeatedly to leave the eu, and it has voted repeatedly to delay actually leaving. Voted for negotiations, and today, i am afraid it has voted to stop, to scuttle any serious negotiations. Prime minister johnson what this bill means is the parliament or the right honorable general
He is characteristically evasive. It is a bill that effectively ends the negotiations. A bill that demands an extension at least until next year and perhaps for many more years to come. A bill that insists britain acquiesced to the demands of brussels and hands control to our partners in a bill designed to overturn the biggest democratic vote in our history. It is therefore a bill without precedent in the history of this house, seeking as it does to force the Prime Minister with a predrafted letter to surrender in international negotiations. And i refuse to do this, mr. Speaker. It is clear there is only one way forward for the country. The house has voted repeatedly to leave the eu and it is repeatedly to delay actually leaving. It is noted for negotiations. And today, i am afraid it is voted to stop any serious negotiations. [indiscernible] Prime Minister johnson what this bill means is the parliament or the right honorable general gentlemen of the opposition who is still not in his
Saying they want to respect the will of the referendum. But every time we come to a vote on the matter there is always a reason why they cannot quite bring themselves to go to the lobby and vote for the Withdrawal Agreement. We have had three occasions in which we could have voted for the with all agree Withdrawal Agreement. Every single time, the same mps trot out to say they support the result and when it comes to the vote they vote to block brexit. So whats different this time . Votes thatingful took place are a very different had a goal different kettle of fish. The cross party talks contain a number of extremely important compromises and concessions for the extension. And it is therefore attractive as this parliament has not had the opportunity to debate the Withdrawal Agreement. Its a different kettle of fish to what went before. Memories,with short the Withdrawal Agreement built was very different to the former Prime Ministers initial socalled blind brexit which was rejected thr