Client privilege that any individual or any body has. We have an obligation to protect and keep it private and so going into the private session is to make sure that we as litigants dont wave any Attorney Client privilege and it is not anything to keep any information from the public. It is something that we have to do as litigants if we are going to have Attorney Client privilege, which we want to enjoy as litigants in any type of a situation. As anyone would want. Yes. Lawyer client privilege. Of course. Any other comments or discussion on this . Public comment . Ray hartz, director of San Francisco open government. This will be a closed session and all members of the public will be asked to leave the chamber. I would insist that mr. Hur be asked to leave the chamber also, he has already recused himself based on the fact that his law partner is representing the party and some of your discussion might give him privileged information that could be passed on to his law partner and the p
But in having a say more than in at least 18 instances in the past on through measures that address the future of the water front. You may not like what the voters have to say, but i think that even though who disagree with a specific po six should support the right of voters in a democracy to have a voice. The rest i submit. Thank you supervisor campos. Seeing no other names on the roster that concludes the introduction of new business. Thank you. Since our chief is back and i know he has a lot of work on his plate id like to go back to the item about home detention so we can go to item 50. I know there are a number of colleagues who have a number of questions, but thank you for rushing back. If you want to take a few moments to explain your perspective, we heard it secondhand through jason elliot, but if you could share with us why you have issues. Sure. I really apologize that i had to leave. I never want to be disrespectful. I knee how busy you are and how long these nights go but
Email that im sorry, the so theres two levels. Theres property crimes that are part of crimes like burglary, auto theft and then the misdemeanor crimes, some of these can be violent, like, assault, battery, and like that. Part two i just want to clarify because you said youre categorically opposed but this email makes it sound like youre okay with the program unless thats actually christine fountain, shes the Office Manager and she spoke with deputy chief, who i must not have been immediately available so they said as long as theres not a rise in crime the first i even heard of this was yesterday and i apologize for not being in the committee meetings, but im a person whos been in court quite a bit, as again some of the other attorneys here, and i believe we have a good process. Going back to the email, sfpd doesnt have any concerns with this change . Unless property crime went up 13 , which it did. Now post that email youre saying we are concerned because part two crimes did rise. As
The attorney for the public defender. Would make a petition to the court that the person be allowed to go on em. Okay. And that can already happen . Yes. Does it happen after 30 days or after 60 days or any point in time . As many times or often as an attorney cares to make that petition. I didnt realize that. So this change would then allow the sheriff to be able to make that petition . Right. Okay. My second question is what are part two crimes . Non violent crimes. So my last question is this email that im sorry, the so theres two levels. Theres property crimes that are part of crimes like burglary, auto theft and then the misdemeanor crimes, some of these can be violent, like, assault, battery, and like that. Part two i just want to clarify because you said youre categorically opposed but this email makes it sound like youre okay with the program unless thats actually christine fountain, shes the Office Manager and she spoke with deputy chief, who i must not have been immediately a
Has resulted in spills and contaminations. The port and department of environment have both shown leader ship on this issue and willingness to Work Together and bring a poll say forward to board of supervisors to restrict the transport and export of these armful materials inside San Francisco. The port has also consistently rejected proposals from companies who are looking to use port property to export coal and in may, the policy committee of the commission on the environment adopted a resolution asking staff to work with the port to develop a policy. This resolution expresses the board of supervisors support for the collaborative efforts of these two departments and asks for them to bring forward to us a set of recommendations on how we can address the significant environmental issue. And finally, i have three in memoriam id like to introduce today. First is recognizing the life and times and contributions of ruth coalman who passed away last wednesday and miss coalman was the wife o