account noticed a fishing attack, flagged it, and one of them responded by saying, this is a legitimate e-mail, john needs to change his pass word immediately. now, the aide later said he knew it was a fishing e-mail and he meant to write illegitimate, not legitimate. it is shocking, such a small error could have huge repercussions. how often does something like this happen? most hacks today, don, actually begin with an e-mail. it is called social engineering, and what this attack method is, is a junior high schooler could do it. they send malicious links or, like in this case, a fake g-mail. we call this in the security world credential harvesting, in other words stealing people s credentials, and this stuff is really, really common. i i don t think podesta knew, he would never have put in his credentials or his assistant, whoever put in his credentials was fooled by the attack.
theories. he is blaming voters for obsessing about it. the state of our democracy where the leaks of what were frankly not very interesting e-mails ended up being an obsession. the fact that the russians were doing this was not an obsession. listen to this. a typo by clinton may have started all of this. the new york times report an aid warned john podesta and others of a e-mail scam back in march. he wrote this is a legitimate e-mail. john needs to change his pass word immediately. he meant to say illegitimate. that s when jill stein s crusade to expose voter
era. nothing will happen because we are too boring to be spied on. no one cares about our stupid lives. very good point. if you are not doing something wrong you shouldn t be worried about that. can i have the pass word to your e-mail? you know what it is? privacy is essential to your humanity. you are de humanized when you don t have privacy. privacy ers haves security. that is the choice the congress is possessing. they are saying we are going to do nothing to stem the tied. but you tax mayor american citizen make sure we can read your e-mail and listen to your phone conversations. no one is going to listen to your conversations. look at david petraeus. that was a weird scene.
party s home stage it says this, we made the main stream media use stopple hillary as a pass word to get wifi tonight. they did set that pass word. they didn t do it just as a stunt. it is the thing they are most excited about. they are more excited about that than anything else now. they are cackling over how awesome that was at the top of gop.com right now. the republican party s home page. neener, neener. scroll down and see that the republican party s hillary clinton fixation is not confined to just stunts involving pass words. the republican party has launched anti-hillary clinton ads this week in seven states. the ad specifically protests against what they are now calling her plan to close guantanamo. the obama clinton plan. they want to impeach hillary clinton on her first day as
states interestingly enough. even if the images of yourself under the age of 18. it s illegal under federal law right now. nothing to save it. and it will destroy reputations and seen suicides relating to sectioning gone wrong. it is disturbing. some teens say they re less concerned about sending the risque photos of themselves because of the technology here. used in these vault apps. how secure are these vault apps in reality? really not very secure. something s only secure as a pass word and most guess or know it because it s been shared with them. snap chat was the one that everybody thought was anonymous. put it up and be gone after ten minutes. a quick idea until they realized that anybody could capture it and then share it later on so our young people are learning that whatever technology they think is safe at the time isn t as safe as they thought. perry, we ll leave it there.