criminal negligence several times. i think the d.a. said something else really interesting. she said this is a complex case and every detail is going to matter, because it s important to note there is no book on this kind of scenario. it doesn t happen that often in contrast to something like a car accident where you might be looking at an involuntary manslaughter charge. there is a standard checklist. was the person drunk? was the person speeding? was the person texting? this is an on-set shooting with what appeared to be apparently a live firearm. there is no standard case on this. so how does the prosecutor make that decision? i think there is a misconception that you plug it in and a m message comes out that says charge or don t charge. they will sit down and say, what do we think? is this criminally excusable? is this something we can charge? is this something we can argue in front of a jury?