Page 66 - Phrasing News Today

Able to refute the claims made against her? able to refute the claims made auainst her? ~ ., .,, ., , against her? what he has done is restated the _ against her? what he has done is restated the defence _ against her? what he has done is restated the defence that - against her? what he has done is restated the defence that she - against her? what he has done is| restated the defence that she had made, herspokesperson restated the defence that she had made, her spokesperson had made the day befo...

We will be hearing later from june kelly, he was at court for the sentencing earlier. the chancellor, rishi sunak, has been defending his wife over criticism of her tax arrangements, saying his family are the targets of a smear campaign. akshata murty pays £30,000 a year for her non—domiciled status, which means she does not have to pay uk tax on her overseas income. what he has done is restated the defence that she had her spokesperson had made the day before. what he has said is that she ha...

>> as terrorists. thats the only thing that breaks through. >> since you brought that up, malcolm. i do want to play a sound byte. its baffling to me why ted cruz is able to walk around without a spine and legislate without sense and character. lets listen to what he said to tucker carlson. well talk it to on the other side. >> we are approach ac solemn anniversary this week and it is an anniversary of a violent terrorist attack on the capitol where we saw the men and women of law enforcement de...

Carelessly. and yet you call this a terror attack when bino definition was it a terror attack. that was a lie. you told that lie on purpose and im wondering why you did. >> thank you for having me on. when you married your episode a last night i sent you a check shortly thereafter and said i would like to go on because the way i phrase things yesterday, it was sloppy and frankly dumb -- >> tucker: i dont buy that. well, well, while! ive known you long timelo since before he went to senate. you w...

Smarter than i am. and you never use words carelessly. and yet you call this a terror attack when bino definition was it a terror attack. that was a lie. you told that lie on purpose and im wondering why you did. >> thank you for having me on. when you married your episode last night i sent you a check shortly thereafter and said i would like to go on because the way i phrase things yesterday, it was sloppy and frankly dumb -- >> tucker: i dont buy that. well, well, while! ive known you long tim...

The phrasing of all of this just puts it in a way that people say what is she talking about? >> bill: she said you can look through the gps and figure out the directions. i guess you can. there may be a more elegant way of saying that. >> this is an administration arguing large parts of the country dont have wifi and internet and dont have access. so what are you going to gps? >> bill: point taken. see you at 6:00. waiting on the president now. i think the other thing dana we talked about the qu...

Terrorist attack. he went on the tucker carlson show to clean up what was an accurate characterization of that day. however, it did not go so well. lets take a look. >> the way i phrased things yesterday, it was sloppy and it was frank lip dumb. >> i dont buy that. i dont buy that. look, ive known you a long time since before you went to the senate. youre a supreme court contender. you take words as seriously as any man whos ever served in the senate. and you repeat that had phrase. i do not bel...

Was the rest of the plan. what about that rest of the plan? was that cool? getting republican state legislatures whatever gossamer or false pretext they needed to throw out election results and instead replace them with, were just going to say trump won, because that was a real plan, and we know a lot more about that plan today than we did a year ago. did attorney general merrick garland today let the country know if that other part of it was okay? we know theyre prosecuting people who broke win...

That is who i was talking about. and the reason the phrasing was sloppy is i have talked dozens if not hundreds of times. ive drew a distinction -- i wasnt saying the thousands of peaceful protesters supporting donald trump are somehow terrorists.sl i didnt say the millions of patriots cross-country supporting trump are terrorists, that is what a lot of people misunderstood -- >> tucker: hold on, what you just said doesnt even make sense. if someone assaults a copy he should go to jail, i couldn...

It was sloppy and it was frankly dumb. >> i dont buy that. whoa, whoa, whoa. look, i have known you a long time since before you went to the senate. you were a supreme court contender. you take words as seriously as any man who ever served in the senate. and every word -- you repeated that phrase. i do not believe that you used that accidentally. >> so, tucker, as a result of my sloppy phrasing, its caused a lot of people to misunderstand what i meant. let me tell you what -- what i meant to say...