super durp jourduper journalism super durp duper journalism super duper journalism awards. greg: i don t know. so this is where we honor writers who impress us with their brave journalistic pursuits and tonight s winner, we get right to it, jeremy bailey a writer for the rap an entertainment web site. friday he broke a major story about a famous tv anchor saying something shockingly disgusting to a co-anchor. i believe we have tape of what actually caused the uproar. a lot of these homeless services that are getting a lot of money, more and more money, it s not working. the solution is, in listening to the homeless, like the woman who says we are spoiled, we need tough love or we re never going to get off the street. greg, what do you think about that approach? greg: i agree with everything the little lady says and i m sorry about the cart: now did you catch that, panelist greg gutfeld otherwise known as me referred to dana perino as a little lady. talk about a mi
as imperious as always, he emerged today if he s going to take any questions to defend his departments actions lea via president trump yuri to speak on my role is to be completely consistent during the special counsel regulations. following the regulations. laura: let s be very clear here. the issue is are you acting in good faith or part of a political operation to get a conviction of trump by any means necessary? 81% of republicans believe this about this is all about politics and protecting one of the more destructive presidents the united states has ever had joe biden. and they are right. consider the situation this way. no one believes that merrick garland would still be ag if he didn t, hadn t green light a special prosecutor in this case. everyone at msnbc and cnn believed that merrick garland s trying to put trump in jail. no matter where the facts leave. otherwise, they would be calling tonight for his removal. it s really not that complicated. any of the lawyers
acknowledging he took those documents and claiming he had every right to take them. under the presidential records act, which is civil, not criminal, i had every right to have these documents. in other words, whatever documents a president decides to take with him, he has the right to do so. it s an absolute right. this is the law. independent legal experts say that s not true. it could hurt him at a trial. is he betting on an election victory for republicans and getting the case dropped? i will speak to former top cia attorney jeff smith about the legal strategy. are more republican politicians, including some rivals, now willing to criticize donald trump s handling of national secrets? the handling of classified materials is a very serious matter. i had a chance to review the indictment over the weekend. this indictment contains serious charges. i can t defend what is alleged. the former president has a right to his day in court. i know he pled not guilty. i will
running on? the economy is danger of recession, foreign policy blunders have created in america with less power and influence and unholy alliances led by china keep growing and oh yeah, the massive corruption engulfing his presidency shows no sign of abating. watch this remarkable moment from the white house briefing yesterday. one committee trying to get an fbi file alleging biden took bribes and an allegation of covering up an investigation and 53 percent of the public including important democrats believe joe biden was involved in his son with an illegal influence peddling scheme there is evidence the president will interact with his relatives and associates china, mexico, russia, ukraine. would you say to the majority of americans who believe the president himself is corrupt? the president has spoken to this.the president has spoken to this. there s nothing to these claims. i don t know if you could hear it but off-camera scurvy was trying to figure out how to answe
our spirit of individualismf ce once and for all. our government spends too muchut money. we learned more about that this week. week. but perhaps more importantly, r they work tirelessly each datay to promote more freedoms awayan and tell us what we can do. w how we can do it, and probablyye most concerning why we should do it. d in other words, they want to our moral compass, our consciencel and our conviction. for most of usf us , this is rey troubling because we already have a fundamental belief system. ental beour sense of right and r was set years of learning and parenting and our experiences and faith. what wperiencee call in the sou, our raisen. we were well raised to have ethics and beliefs we hold, but maybe that s not exactlye fo the case for an increasingly growing segment of our population. easingly gmaybe more and more ar aren t getting necessarily examples traditionally setr motr by their mothers and fathers, making it easier for the state to step in and fill th