asked him to look at them in the eyes. i think that what s they re saying, look at us as women. listen to our stories. believe our stories. give us an opportunity to be heard. so i can think of no legal reason. obviously there s some time constraints. but there s no legal reason that julie swetnik should not be included in this investigation. how problematic is it if she is not included, given that the president has already expressed via tweet and other ways his disdain for the attorney, michael avenatti, who is representing swetnik? if she is not included in this scope, how could it not look political? i imagine at some point avenatti will get a call. but it s really for the fbi at this point to decide if an allegation is credible or not. i think the limited in scope piece means that in this kind of situation, it s not unusual for, you know, lots and lots of people, for lots and lots of motivations, to kind of come out