And the photographs that i have, could we have the overhead . I need the overhead enlarged victor. From what the neighbors could see of the work being conducted, at the site, this was certainly not done in one day. These are shots that they could only take through the open doors. The entire building was gutted. As you can see from the new steel walls, the work had been going on for weeks. So, the implication that somehow they got their permit and they got them on time and they got it done, that is just not correct. We supplied the board with the permit history and the complaint history of this site just for a bit of flavor, if you will. And that is the exhibit 4, and exhibit 5 to my brief. To show that this owner never gets permits. A 40yearold building which does not have a single final permit. If you look at exhibit 5, i set out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk r
Educational after school use excel to the proposed use of vocal point and in reviewing the matter, we did find that the proposed use of vocal point does not comply with the definition of Financial Service in the planning code. It is i believe a business or professional service use. Which is not listed among the uses that is considered to be an act of commercial use. And let me back up. , the property, 239526th avenue is located at the end of 26th avenue and the unit is 1600, and there are a couple of storefronts and it is just one of the storefronts that is in question and the changing of the use to vocal point. And while it seems that most of the attention to this property came about because of the conditional use application that they have on file for a wireless facility, what is going on here and the activity is not related to the wireless facility that they have an application in for but in relation for the change of use for this business and professional service use. The definitio
Out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk repair permit and a street permit and the permit in front of you today. And so, even with all of the tenant problems and the complaints that took months to prepare and for the 40yearold building there has never been a single permit taken out until the neighbors complained about work going on and in the current permit was taken out. The neighbors filed this appeal because they had no idea what was going on. They attended a Community Meeting i believe it was on november the fifth and within a few days of attending that Community Meeting about the wireless antenna facility, the construction started. They had no choice, having received no notice, no permits and no plans, on file anywhere. And could not get any information, they had no choice but to assume that they were starting the work on the wireless facility. And i dont think th
The active commercial uses and it says that if it is not on that list, then it needs a conditional use authorization and then the Planning Commission heard this legislation in june of last year and it was very clear to them what the supervisors intent was on this legislation and so i have highlighted on the overhead is a passage that all of the ncds and several and i think that there were four neighborhood districts created in the sunset. That used to be nc one and two, Zoning Districts that were created and named with the commercial districts and so this was a terrible cd and these are all ncd and any ground for a commercial use that was not active as defined as 145. 4 would require a conditional use authorization and a business and professional service use is not one of these as defined as active and 135. 4, but i think that it is clear here what the requirements are that a conditional use authorization is required. The permit holder is correct in that we did suggest some recommended
Out there has only been four permits in the history of this building. There was a reroofing permit in 1991, when expired without being finalized and a sidewalk repair permit and a street permit and the permit in front of you today. And so, even with all of the tenant problems and the complaints that took months to prepare and for the 40yearold building there has never been a single permit taken out until the neighbors complained about work going on and in the current permit was taken out. The neighbors filed this appeal because they had no idea what was going on. They attended a Community Meeting i believe it was on november the fifth and within a few days of attending that Community Meeting about the wireless antenna facility, the construction started. They had no choice, having received no notice, no permits and no plans, on file anywhere. And could not get any information, they had no choice but to assume that they were starting the work on the wireless facility. And i dont think th