you know, american newspapers try by and large. they have sensibilities, they have outlooks, you know, the biases and lived experiences of their journalists will affect their choices, but you know, they have an outlook that is different, i think, than the sort of more explicit place on the spectrum that you might find in the uk. i think msnbc, for example, does play what happened onjanuary 6 the investigation, the aftermath, the implications to a greater degree, a more disproportionate degree, you could argue, than, say, a place like npr or the new york times, which does cover as well in great depth the kinds of policy arguments and political debates that robert just referred to. i would remind you that cable does everything disproportionate. it never does things as sort of a magazine with 17 different stories an hour. they cover three orfour stories an hour, and one of them, they will do out of proportion regardless. what i would say is this is fundamentally, in some ways, the sto
no one is suggesting this is not the story but it s the degree to which it s being covered. do you suspect liberal media had incentives to be on editorial judgements for focusing on this? i want to be careful about accepting the idea of liberal media that the washington post is exactly the way the guardian is. american newspapers try by and large. they have sensibilities and outlooks and the experience i think the choices but they have 0utlook that is different than bees are expected based on the spectrum you might find in the uk. msnbc does play what happened on january six the investigation in the aftermath to a greater degree and emma disproportionate degree than like npr or the new york times which does cover ingrate that s the kind of policy arguments and political debates that robert referred to. i would remind your cable does everything disproportionate.
coming out of the high court today, but i want to pick up with you just where our correspondent, alex, left off and that s with justice sotomayor s comments. now, we knew that breyer, kagan and sotomayor favored the measures, but sotomayor went so far as defending the policies by stating unproven medical facts. what is up with that? well, justice sotomayor should not be talking about issues like that because she is a judge and her job is to apply the law, whether it be the constitution or the federal statutory law, it is not her job or any of the justices job to engage in policy making and make good policy arguments and i think that that s just shows that, you know, justice sotomayor, who is known as really a liberal judicial activist is happy to engage in policy making from the bench. that s not the knob of the job of the judges, it s to the
thati5 the choices but they have outlook that is different than bee5 are expected based on the spectrum you might find in the uk. msnbc doe5 play what happened onjanuary might find in the uk. msnbc doe5 play what happened on january 5ix the investigation in the aftermath to a greater degree and emma disproportionate degree than like npr or the new york times which does cover ingrate that s the kind of policy arguments and political debates that robert referred to. i would remind your cable doe5 would remind your cable does everything disproportionate. it never does things as a magazine with 17 different storie5 never does things as a magazine with 17 different stories in our. they cover three or more stories and they will do out of proportion regardless. analogy i5 will do out of proportion regardless. analogy is this is fundamentally the story of our moment. it s wrong to say there were concerns about the integrity of these elections and gives the5e elections and gives organisations a
but it s the degree to which it s being covered. do you suspect liberal media had incentives to be on editorialjudgements forfocusing on this? well, i want to be careful about accepting the idea of liberal media that the washington post is exactly the way the guardian is. you know, american newspapers try by and large. they have sensibilities and outlooks and the experience. i think the choices but they have outlook but is more explicit than the place you will find things on the spectrum and in the uk. the investigation in the aftermath to a greater degree and more disproportionate degree than like npr or the new york times which does cover ingrate that s the kind of policy arguments and political debates that robert referred to. i would remind you that cable does everything disproportionate. it never does things as sort of a magazine with 17 different stories now, they cover three or four