Latest Breaking News On - Pollution issues - Page 1 : vimarsana.com
Apple s looking at doing all these rumors apple is going to do a bigger headquarters somewhere else. the headquarters is in seattle, just the way it is and it s been founded there and that s where the real headquarters are. other companies are looking to expand, but they won t do it so loudly. tax breaks are something we have to think about, a lot of mayors decided not to do this. san jose, another city, i forget the cities that declined to do it. the question is, should these cities pay to attract these incredibly successful companies? why do we do it this way? it s like sports stadiums or other things. what s the economic impact, really, of doing this, and also the economic cost? there s going to be housing issues, transportation issues, traffic issues, pollution issues. like, it adds onto a city to have to bring in this many workers. to that exact point, newly elected alexandra amazon is a
SomewhereHeadquartersDoingRumors-appleSeattleAppleLotSomethingCitiesCompaniesTax-breaksNew-yorkAnd ted cruz accused china of starting a cyber warfare in america. many are wondering how president obama will respond. i want to go back to one of the phrases that donald used, giant sucking sound, which immediately triggered in my head ross perot. it s bringing back this economic angst that americans have, even on paper it s good. one of the things that s hard for human beings, especially for americans, we see the world as america at the center and everyone else impacting us. china are moving people from rural areas into cities, they have to build places for them to live, they re trying to figure out health problems, they have pollution issues, we saw this explosion. so there is a lot going on in that country, and i think donald trump is tapping into an american angst that exists about
China-sPresidentUnited-statesObamaManyWarfareTed-cruzThingsOneAngstGiant-sucking-soundRoss-perotSet their hair on fire talking about how they re going to crush america and we were going to be china s grainry. it s not working out that way. also raises real questions about the chinese threat. so many people have this dark view of china. it s possible as things get worse at home they ll get more adventurist abroad but the question is how to maintain stability amongst economic slowdown. we have tiananmen square. you ll see significant protests in china. i would say the chinese leadership have demographic issues, they have pollution issues, they have economic issues. not easy. i asked jon huntsman after he came back from china, i said what is the one thing the chinese government wants? do they want to expand? do they want to dominate? what do they want? what do communist want? he said they only want one thing.
PeopleWayThingsQuestionsChina-sAmericansThreatChineseHomeHairFireViewRain. so time and time, when science pointed to health risks, special interests cried wolf to protect their own agenda, not the agenda of the american people, and time after time we followed the science, we protected the american people and the doomsday predictions never came true. since the clean air act was first passed in 1963 there s been a long history of bipartisan support in congress, bipartisan votes in congress to handle pollution issues. but today s limits, the announced limits today on pollution from power plants, these ones today were not subject to a vote in congress. the epa announced these changes today under their own authority as an agency. in a 2007 ruling the supreme court held that the clean air act was unambiguous, that as a law the clean air act requires the government to act to keep the air clean. and when there are pollutants in
PeopleScienceWolfInterestsAgendaHealth-risksCongressClean-air-actHistorySupportDoomsday-predictions1963Our lights are still on, and we have dramatically reduced acid rain. so time and time, when science pointed to health risks, special interests cried wolf to protect their own agenda, not the agenda of the american people, and time after time we followed the science, we protected the american people and the doomsday predictions never came true. since the clean air act was first passed in 1963 there s been a long history of bipartisan support in congress, bipartisan votes in congress to handle pollution issues. but today s limits, the announced limits today on pollution from power plants, these ones today were not subject to a vote in congress. the epa announced these changes today under their own authority as an agency. in a 2007 ruling the supreme court held that the clean air act was unambiguous, that as a law the clean air act requires the government to act to keep
Acid-rainScienceInterestsWolfAgendaLightsHealth-risksPeopleDoomsday-predictionsCongressPollutionPower-plantsPollution issues. and all those things, of course, affect our planet and our oceans, but it affects us fundamentally. and that s what we really have to be worried about. let s talk about the six aquanauts that are going to be down there with you. yes. what are you going to do all day? well, they re about as crazy as i am if they re coming with me, but we ll be doing a lot of things. we re going to be diving six to nine hours a day, going down to depths of up to 150 feet or maybe even more. we re going to be looking at the fo phosphorusence and luminescence of the coral reefs, what i call underwater cities, and what my grandfather only dreamed of, we ll be able to reach millions of people, millions of students around the world for 31 full days live in realtime through things like skype in the classroom. so, you swim under, kind of like the old movies, where we d see you pop up, and you ll be in the air and aquarius will be full of air, but there will be water all around this,
UsCourseThingsAquanautsPlanetOceansPollution-issuesTalkLetSixLotYesWeren t safe. we had medicines that turned into prescriptions before well tested. we had a consumer market right down to meat and drugs were being given to the public. we were told, let the industries that produce them police them. that is like asking the fox to police the hen house. i made animal fox, not this fox. john: in this case it might be appropriate. in any case, you can t ask the people who are in the business of making things for profit to often police their goods. john: yes, you can i would argue. let s talk about one at a time. you said nuclear. i m with you that on pollution issues. nuclear regulatory agency, all kinds of pollution controls because there is month market. john: they don t have to keep passing more rules. that happened under richard
MeatPrescriptionsDrugsIndustriesConsumer-marketMedicinesPublicWerent-safeJohnCaseHen-houseFoxRotting meat. we had nuclear plants that weren t safe. we had medicines that turned into prescriptions before well tested. we had a consumer market right down to meat and drugs were being given to the public. we were told, let the industries that produce them police them. that is like asking the fox to police the hen house. i made animal fox, not this fox. john: in this case it might be appropriate. in any case, you can t ask the people who are in the business of making things for profit to often police their goods. john: yes, you can i would argue. let s talk about one at a time. you said nuclear. i m with you that on pollution issues. nuclear regulatory agency, all kinds of pollution controls because there is month market. john: they don t have to keep passing more rules.
MeatDrugsMedicinesConsumer-marketPlantsRotting-meatPrescriptionsWerent-safeJohnCaseIndustriesHen-house