Page 31 - Polygraph Test News Today

Yesterday to the judiciary committee from this ex-boyfriend of christine blasey ford who said she never expressed any fear being in closed spaces, no hint of claustrophobia, and that she helped prepare her friend for possible polygraph test, that friend came out and said "i have never had christine blasey ford or anybody else prepare me or provide any other type of assistance whatsoever in connection with any polygraph exam i have taken at any time." there is so much he said, she said in this ca...

Of the doubt, was at 36 years ago? maybe her memory is just not straight and then you go to the recent problems. shes had chosen a member of "the washington post" got her therapist notes. "the washington post" said that she provided them to her. she cant remember when she had the polygraph test. there is a complete farce from her and her attorney to be able to fly but it turns out she has fly to hawaii, close to rica. we have seen all of these inconsistencies, not just long-term memory but from ...

Prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the committee. then theco prosecutor went on to listue multiple issues where professor fords accusations, including no consistent account of when the alleged assault actually happened, a failure to previously identified judge kavanaugh as the assailant, inconsistent descriptions of the alleged assault, a failure to remember key details including who invited ford to the party, how she got to the party, where the party took place, and h...

I do not think any reasonable prosecutor would bring this case based on the evidence before the committee. the prosecutor went on to list multiple issues were professor fords allegations including no consistent account and when the alleged assault actually happened, a failure to progress identify judge kavanaugh as he is salient. a failure to member key details including who remembered him to the party, how she got to the party and where the party even took place. how she got home from the party...

It was four boys and two girls. even if you give her the benefit of the doubt, was it 36 years ago?r maybe her memory is just not straight and then you go to the recent problems.nd shes said she doesnt remember how a member of "the washington post" got her therapist notes. yet "the washington post" saidid that she provided them to her. she cant remember when she had the polygraph test. there is a complete farce from her and her attorney saying that she is afraid to fly. then it turns out shes fl...

Veteran agent. let me ask you about a polygraph test for kavanaugh. is he under any obligation, and if he passes, if he says no, i dont want to take one, does that get noted somewhere? >> absolutely it will be offered, and ive seen it done. i have personally been involved in derogatory allegations against nominees where a polygraph was taken and, in fact, in those cases its cleared the nominee. so dr. ford took a polygraph exam. judge kavanaugh will be offered one, and if he refuses, it will be ...

Was saying over this time period and that he didnt remember what happened. so i was simply trying to get at that and really couching it in the fact that i had alcoholism in my own family. my dad who is 90 now struggled with it throughout his life and finally got treatment and is sober and got help from aa. so i was actually trying to get at the truth. and so thats why i was stunned by how he answered it. but, of course, he later apologized. >> do you think that he was telling the truth when he s...

And other things. now, they have not been interviewed by the fbi. and so that was my hope. when he apologized i said look, i just want to see an fbi investigation here. we know that she passed a polygraph test, which while not admissible in regular court, is used all the time for fbi, for cia, for defense department. and she passed it with flying colors. so these are the things that the fbi could look at if they evaluated the credibility of the witnesses. >> are you confident -- you just heard k...

That you cant even call a criminal investigation, though the purpose is not to create a prosecutable case or not. its to uncover the credibility and validity of some of the allegations made. to just present that to the senate and let them make the decision about how they feel about the information. that has not been done. it was not done by the senate judiciary impliee at all, nothing even close to a full vetting of this information has occurred yet. heres one of the interesting issues that i ha...

Watching body language, tone, inflection, all of those things matter so much as well as the ability to ask follow-up questions. so that would be absolutely the place i would start. the other two places that are owe interesting and im delighted to hear the breaking news that the scope of the investigation is not just limited to dr. ford who gave a compelling hearing yesterday, but theyre going to investigate and interview also deborah ramirez and julie swetnick it sound like from your report. so ...