this unacceptable for a leading industrial nation. here is in effect on how things haven t been up to scratch so far with the theater i m just asking that we actually get what s promised at the spectrum auction this time. the federal network agency wants ninety eight percent of homes to have access to five g. but an estimated ten to twenty percent of the total land will still be under supplied especially in areas where few people live or where motorways all railways run three. the minister for digital infrastructure refuses to accept that considering the money involved. when we re talking billions will establish very clear means of controlling and sanctioning so we get complete coverage because. rebel communities also want good reception and network operators fit the high costs of one hundred percent coverage even which no non-sport and with ninety nine percent population coverage will cover about ninety percent of the london germany
but an estimated ten to twenty percent of the total land will still be under supplied especially in areas where few people live or where motorways old railway is from three. the minister for digital infrastructure refuses to accept that considering the money involved. when we re talking billions we ll establish very clear means of controlling and sanctioning so we get complete coverage because. we re real communities also want good reception a network operators fit the high costs of one hundred percent coverage no non-sport and with ninety nine percent population coverage we ll cover about ninety percent of the london germany that s was in germany is thirty percent forest was four turned on and it had one gate dacha germany is heading for a digital world than the network needs to be available everywhere digitalisation everywhere regardless of whether you live in a city or in the countryside or off. industries like smart manufacturing and
population coverage in the world. it provides cash traens fers to people living below the poverty line which is about $350 a year. they comprise just 3% of the population. it grew from fewer than 1% in 1997 to more than 75 million at its height in 2011. the chinese are not where they should be on welfare spending but ramping up the reach of programs across the board. what i ve described china s wealth soaring as it dra mat i believe dramatically expands welfare. whatever china does, it does on a massive scale. regulations that threaten to choke wealth can fall away with ease. that s because of china s mix of economic systems. this kind of boundless growth, a nation undergoing a consumer