people. and bipartisan consensus on white supremacy. it s important however the current issues are resolved that the compromise that ends the conflict is not one that resembles the one that we saw in 1877. i want you to weigh in. i find it interesting that the president trump and the campaign use one of the same terms that nixon did. silent majority term. what does that come to mean in the trump era? they re not silent anymore. they re not. what we re really saying is that in our society that great change doesn t come with without great pain. power doesn t want to give up power. and there s no question that s true. thst also so much that happened in the last decade that changed the nature of the dialogue and the politics. with the advent of the ef evolution of internet kp talk
of reconciliation if does not include that, will be empty. and the reason i say that because in the past during the past moments where parties were polarized along racial lines the solution that brought about the i think it is important that however our current issues are resolved that we compromise the conflict doesn t resemble we saw in 1887 as described in there. i find it interesting that president trump and his campaign used one of the same terms nixon did, the silent majority term, phrase. what does that come to mean now then trump era when they re not so silent anymore? well, they re not. and i think what we re really saying is that in our society that great change doesn t come without great pain usually. and power doesn t want to give
and quite frankly, i think that he is clear and the rest of us are clear that the american public wants to hear about the issues and the path forward in the democratic plan. and though, can he still influence the democratic vote or has the democratic party moved on from the obama era? well, you know, power doesn t cede itself willingly, and people are trying to make it an okay boomer situation, and it is not. we have millennials who have been picking up the baton from the establishment, and you have some elders who have a clear urgency in the progressive path they would like to see take place. i do think that the democratic party has seen a shift in terms of people s willingness to get involved themselves and place demands and accountability on the elected officials, and so the party needs to move with the people. and frankly, barack obama is the ultimate emcee.
been asked to hand over tax returns for ty vance. and let s start with judge jackson s ruling in this district court. it s a long ruling and it s quite it goes right to the point. she writes however busy or seth aid might be, the power doesn t have the power to excuse him or her from performing the action the law requires. we keep seeing this for a reason. there s a reason the courts ru the president s administration but forcefully and evoking this is what the constitution says and your position is absolutely ridiculous, basically. that s not something you often see unany kind of litigation let
laura: trump had no right apparently. apparently the power doesn t have the power to appoint his own people. march of this year, i picked up a phone call and it s a career diplomat. he said you won t believe with ukraine ambassador adjusted, there is an election and she just gave a speech calling for the removal of a official. i start digging into her. who is this person. it s interesting. i find out and 2018, pete sessions writes a letter to mike pompeo because she s bad mouthing donald trump. her embassy is funding george soros. you go through all these things and there is a big body of record, she is not allied with the president but he didn t need any reason at all to fire her. it s contrived. laura: at the state department, and the intel community are still working against this president s