than one department. there is no single simple thing that will help solve the problem, there are lots of different aspects, but i was encouraged that the 0br said it was the biggest supply side package that they had ever seen in terms of trying to tackle a problem like this and in terms of the impact it will have on the labour market, different initiatives whether on the outside but also on the welfare side, and otherwise. but also on the welfare side, and otherwise- but also on the welfare side, and otherwise. :, , :, :, otherwise. there was one thing that was trailed in otherwise. there was one thing that was trailed in the otherwise. there was one thing that was trailed in the press otherwise. there was one thing that was trailed in the press leading - otherwise. there was one thing that was trailed in the press leading up | was trailed in the press leading up to the was trailed in the press leading up to the budget was trailed in the press leading up to the budget. i wa
complaint to congress. it s not there. he does not have that authority. so he s broken the law. he needs to explain himself on that. and then he needs to tell us the substance of the complaint. because again, none of us know what s in there. it may be nothing. this press speculation may be nothing, but here s why this is important, kate. our entire structure of protecting whistleblowers is at stake. right now there is a whistleblower out there who is thinking, oh, my god, this process got short-circuited. my career might suffer, i might be in danger. and the problem with that is if whistleblowers think that way, misbehavior in a very, very dangerous world, the intelligence world, won t go reported, or it will get reported the way edward snowden took his space to the public, by blowing important secrets. that is not a good outcome. that is a very interesting perspective in this. congressman, many more questions. not for today, though. thank you so much. i appreciate it. the press co
appropriations committee and things we are doing are not as of a couple of hours ago zblapg did nancy pelosi lock up that performance? did the remaining holdouts start to feel better about her? i think that you are seeing she showed why she will be a strong speaker. i think that there have been a lot of conversations. i have always said that she will get these votes one by one because there s nobody better at getting votes than nancy pelosi. i think we are moving towards putting all of this press speculation, will she or won t she behind us and getting on with doing what we need to do to keep this government going, to keeping this country safe and addressing a lot of problems that people care about. so, is she going to embrace term limits? what does that mean? is it term limits for leaders p leadership? term limits for chairs? are you going to embrace what the house republicans do when it comes to leadership terms?