Page 425 - Pretext News Today

Manafort got in big trouble, hes looking at a life sentence behind bars in solitary confinement. tony podesta, whatever happened to him? tonight we can report exclusively based on two separate sources we spoke to today that tony podesta has been offered immunity by robert mueller to testify against paul manafort. for a near identical crime, bill and hillarys friend could escape and emerge completely unscathed while paul manafort may rot in jail. only one of them made the mistake of chairing dona...

He is always going to do these things to them. they are going to keep touching the hot stove time and time again. what we have seen in the special elections in 17 and 18 is that the donald trump touch has not helped people like ed gillespie in virginia or rick saccone in pennsylvania. the damage trump does to republicans lasts a long time, and even if they try to, you know, issue a pathetic statement on twitter or what have you, one of those i wish he would have have said that constructs, they a...

For 15 years p. i understand almost all of the files the israelis came out with are 15 years old. clearly this was used for theatrics just days before president trumps decision on staying in the nuclear agreement. it seems very much conspired, to use these files as another pretext for the united states to leave the iran nuclear agreement, even though there was nothing in this cache to indicate iran had violated the terms of that accord. >> that now is likely going to be one of the big subjects o...

These surveillance, the kick off in this investigation began even though they had not interviewed any witnesses. he didnt remember or wouldnt say if he interviewed one person to justify the beginning of that probe. >> you see peter strzok writing an email, we now have a pretext. an excuse to look at carter page. what is the evidence? i dossier page by hillary clinton and a story leaked to michael isikoff. that is based on the dossier. the entire beginning of this investigation goes against every...

Surveillance, the kickoff of the investigation began even though they had not interviewed any witnesses. he didnt remember or wouldnt say if he interviewed one person to justify the beginning of that russian probe. >> you can look at something i wrote a week ago where pete strzok is writing, we have a pretext, an excuse to look at carter page. what is the evidence, a dossier paid by hillary clinton and a story that is based on the dossier. its circular reporting the entire beginning of the inves...

Have to worry about china and korea and other threats and about 2 million troops for our anyone allies. he never mentions the contributions nato makes like afghanistan, 1100 nato soldiers have given their lives alongside american soldiers and contributions they made in places like iraq and syria. he never talks about the positive things of nato just like he never talks about negative things about russia. my conclusion about this his harping on about the cost for nato is a pretext for destroying ...

Harping on about the cost for nato is a pretext for destroying the alliance. >> whos advising him or is he freelancing? facts do matter. everything max said there is correct but not how the president is reacting. >> you look at that image shown of john kelly grimacing and the ambassador next to him, eyes rolling, i think this is what hes coming up on his own. its not just nato, the western alliance more broadly, the institutions the last 70 years, assault on the european union, the attack, overt...

Just a small guy over here. no, peter strzok was in charge of the hillary clinton e-mail investigation. he was in charge --. no, he wasnt. . in channel of the trump investigation. >> no, he wasnt. >> the agent in charge -- >> he was the lead investigator. >> okay. >> get the facts straight. >> lead investigator, im happy to use whatever term you want to use. dismissed from the mueller probe for anti-trump bias. he wanted to stop trump, wanted to find a pretext, how can you sit there as some one ...

Tomplts hurt hillary? it didnt hurt her. >> whoa, whoa, theres no question that that hurt hillary. the fbi did not -- >> thats wasnt his intent. >> the fbi did not talk about the donald trump investigation. if there was any bias it was against hillary. >> because they didnt think he would win. >> whatever you may think. but to your thesis -- >> theyre facts. >> your thesis that the fbi is trying to hurt donald trup and help hillary clinton. >> i dont know how you read stop trump in text messages...

That seek documents. >> yeah. both of them. >> lets say this was the inverse, a democratic now president, who was a candidate, spied on by an agency controlled by bias toward republicans. wouldnt you want committees fighting for every document that they can get? now these committees are showing us that the bias we saw in the text messages, which would have been just fun, but now theyve been institutionalized into pretext, into pressure, into hurry the f up, does not this take private exchanges a...