Thank you very much for taking up these items. And i did want to, before i get into this presentation, thank the mayor and particularly the mayors Budget Office and controller and his economic team, as well as the City Attorneys office. President chiu, supervisor farrell and supervisor avalos. I would like to give a brief overviewhoun it changes things fort taxpayer and how the office of treasurer Tax Collector interacted with the public. The ordinance was passed on november 6th. And it does not apply to the 2013 or prior tax years. And just for your information, tax year is january 1 through december 31. And that affects our payroll expense tax, as well as the new grot gross receipts tax. We will be collecting register fees that affect the 1314 fiscal year. So if gets collected in advance. Payroll expense taxes are over a calendar year and they are filed in arrears, although we do make we ask that the taxpayers make quarterly payments. So the changes to the gross receipts tax and payr
Appropriating 1,566,145 from the general Fund Reserves so to the San Francisco department of treasurer Tax Collector for gross receipts tax implementation planing for fy20122013. These two item goes hand in hand. So we have, i believe greg cotto from the treasurer Tax Collector to present on these two items. Good afternoon, supervisors. Thank you very much for taking up these items. And i did want to, before i get into this presentation, thank the mayor and particularly the mayors Budget Office and controller and his economic team, as well as the City Attorneys office. President chiu, supervisor farrell and supervisor avalos. I would like to give a brief overviewhoun it changes things fort taxpayer and how the office of treasurer Tax Collector interacted with the public. The ordinance was passed on november 6th. And it does not apply to the 2013 or prior tax years. And just for your information, tax year is january 1 through december 31. And that affects our payroll expense tax, as wel
Continuing our evidentbased practices implementation, we know what were doing is working and we are being recognized nationally for our results. Continuing to implement the contracts of Service Providers for housing, sex offender treatment, job readiness, substance abuse, cognitive behavioral services, and as the sheriff spoke previously about the reentry pod. Before i move into changes in the budget, id really like to thank the mayors Budget Office kate howard and Melissa Howard for all their support. Controllers office and also harvey roses office and specifically amanda guma who worked closely with our staff. We are not in complete agreement, but we continue to work on that. But in terms of our overall budget and the changes, all of the changes in our budget is really related to two things. Its related to realignment and went to sack acand fought really hard to get that funding formula change and increase it had last year from 10 to 17 million and this year using that same formula i
Includes 9 million over six years between the treasurer Tax Collector and mani tron manitron and contract of 21 xtech, that would be for 3 million over a fiveyear period, which is anticipated. And again, if you look at this request, as you know, you are only getting approximately a 6month request. If you look at it on an annualized basis the salary cost of some 400,000 would actually be over 800,000. We point out on page 7 of or report, that file 121197, amending the citys annual salary ordinance creating the five new positions is equal to 2. 5 fte in 2013; with salary and mandatory benefits. That is the figure shown in table 2 on page 6 of our report. However, in order for the positions to be. 5 fte, the new employees would need to be added to the payroll on january 1st, 2013. Obviously, that cant happen. So furthermore, we point out that the proposed supplemental ordinance only includes that is the requested itself doesnt include that number 418,185. So taking those two factors into
We looked within our organization and what would be the right, appropriate level, given the reporting structures within our organization. We did not look at necessarily other classifications. We only looks at mea09 series and what was comparable within that. Im wondering if the Mayors Office might be able to address that a bit . Were there other classifications reviewed rather than just the structure within the treasurer Tax Collector . It could very well be this is right classification. I just want to understand that process. Supervisor, as you know, all of the citys classifications are reviewed by dhr and i know dhr did work with the Treasurers Office to identify the appropriate classifications. The09 53 position, just the salary and range for that position is 125,000 to 159,000 on an annual basis. I think the information reflected in the budget analysts report is the fullyloaded costs meaning the Fringe Benefits and the salaries as well. The Deputy Director 3 the 0 53 as i understan