you would have round the table all the relevant people, whether it was the relevant people, whether it was the defence secretary, the aid secretary, the energy secretary, home secretary and the pro minister. prime minister. while of course prime ministers are powerful because they are prime ministers, they don t have a department of the same way that other ministers do, and having the national security adviser and the national security adviser and the national security secretariat working for you and bringing together the whole of government to address these challenges, i thought god politicians involved at the highest level and the right level to make sure this was being looked at properly. 50 make sure this was being looked at ”roerl . ., make sure this was being looked at n-roerl, ., ., ., ., make sure this was being looked at n-roerl. ., ., ., ., ,, . , properly. so a national security council as properly. so a national security council as you properly. so a national secur
joint intelligence committee to write a report on national security and foreign policy in opposition, and foreign policy in opposition, and one of the recommendations she made was to have a full on national security council, to have eight national security adviser, to have a national security adviser, to have a national security secretariat. the point was to first of all make sure that the whole government looked at these risks, and a second to make sure there was real ministerial oversight because the national security council would be chaired by the pro minister. thirdly, to make sure it was strategic, thinking right across the board about all the risks, and also making sure it was a truly international so you looking at risk of terrorism, climate change, space weather, all sorts of things, but also things like pandemics. why i particular thought this was important was, well i think the civil contingencies act and the previous government have done a good job in this regard, i knew th
until the end of the month and it is perfectly possible that a different case can be brought against him, but at the moment that has not happened and imran khan is not preventing us that mark presenting us with that evidence. he also said his party did not have any violence in it. it is true that the pt! has not been encouraging people to act in a violent way, but when we covered the protests we saw people that were very vocal supporters of imran khan out on the streets, throwing stones and using slingshots against the police. so there was certainly a level of fun is being used by people that we spoke to that supported imran khan. another point he made was, he suggested that there had been people who were essentially interlopers inside the crowd that were trying to encourage people to attack the buildings, the army buildings. again, he provided no evidence, is a really difficult for us to verify any of these claims being made by the former pro minister of pakistan, imran khan. pro-m
Transcripts for BBCNEWS BBC News 20240604 14:00:15 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
described as foreign or unlike us and part of that mass, or rather as part of the mass, was the hungarian pro minister, victor aubin, part of the mass, was the hungarian pro minister, victoraubin, he part of the mass, was the hungarian pro minister, victor aubin, he of course has repeatedly criticised migration and you may remember was also responsible for building a wall to stop people crossing into hungary from neighbouring serbia and croatia. make victor 0rban. we will keep an eye on those arrivals and add budapest international airport. now, let s cross to a guest and discuss this pledge of allegiance that has been announced as part of king charles s coronation, coming coronation on saturday. you also the author of the book called modern monarchy. thank you forjoining us on bbc news. what do you make of the allegiance? what do you make of the allegiance? what do you make of the works? i