Buildings. I consider a 30 number plus adding a transfer tax. That make sense to what the general Public Benefit as well as the buildings is concerned i did want to make clear i think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing up the building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco to see buildings fixed up financed and this way rather than with bonds. Thank you commissioner and i have one comment and i appreciate the report i think it was well done. One of the concerns is to make sure theres not an appearance of the conflict of interest that
I do appreciate the gentlemans idea of trying to use up the funds to care for those buildings or so the private sector can care for their own buildings. I consider a 30 number plus adding a transfer tax. That make sense to what the general Public Benefit as well as the buildings is concerned i did want to make clear i think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing uphe building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco to see buildings fixed up financed and this way rather than with bonds. Thank you commissioner and i have one comment and i a
Think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing up the building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco to see buildings fixed up financed and this way rather than with bonds. Thank you commissioner and i have one comment and i appreciate the report i think it was well done. One of the concerns is to make sure theres not an appearance of the conflict of interest that the entity is determining the zoning why not make the 20 or 25 then youre selling it and, in fact, the port is pretty much one story structures would be unlivable and the height
This year the private property t dr folks dont have any other revenue to care for the city we have bonds and other means. I do appreciate the gentlemans idea of trying to use up the funds to care for those buildings or so the private sector can care for their own buildings. I consider a 30 number plus adding a transfer tax. That make sense to what the general Public Benefit as well as the buildings is concerned i did want to make clear i think that its always a problem to fund fixing up a public building that is such as 1 across the street. We sat through a number of hearings and ending battles between the veterans and the trustees and that battle very nearly imperiled the financing for fixing up the building. I think that the public t dr idea could produce a lot of money that the city needs to fix up those buildings to preserve them but do it in a way which the fixing up of the building was not as much at the peril of the varies factions. I would prefer as a citizen of San Francisco t
Specific believe that the t dr was used from. In 2010 there was an amendment to acquire a plan and that was just amended in april. So, now plans are required when your you can certify t dr but wu you have to should how youre going to rehabilitate your building you can use the value of the t dr. Yes as part of the amendments the most recent amendments the department felt there should be some invested interest in the building of where the t drs coming from. We base that provisions in the code whereas, soon as the t dr is sold from 9 property they have to enter into an agreement of how over the, you know, first year and 5th year how theyre going to maintain that building. Not that all the proceeds of the sale go back into the building but a portion for the maintenance commissioner. This may have been there i may have missed it. Since the program was amended to allow the adjacent property has any property used or sold t dr the mint. Thats right. All those t dr has been sold well move this