He feels like there are so many things going on. this is our job. we are always going to focus on it. but the university of michigan reported that you know how many people talked about that? yeah, nobody. charles: 1%. crazy. i got you. i don t disagree with you. i don t think there s any fatal wounds so far or fatal mistakes. my point is that the trial has started. charles: so what should mitch mcconnell do thursday morning or whenever he comes back to work? i think if i was senator mcconnell, his first statement should become a look, we want to reach across the aisle with our democratic colleagues and we want to open the dialogue on the right way to run this. forget about what they really want, right. i think they ve got to do that, because that s what the democrats are doing right now. as they go through that proces process remember, as one example, in a senate impeachment trial, the
Lawyers who had generated some of these inaccuracies, these 17 inaccuracies. what is the process for supervisors fact-checking? under the procedure committee s factual accuracy procedure is put into place in response to prior incidences found of failure to accurately relate information to the court, the first line supervisor is supposed to go through and recheck the process to make sure it was done. that did not happen here on multiple occasions. right, why did nonna happen not these multiple occasions that this work was not checked? because we were given explanations ranging from a lack of understanding of the proces process, they were trying to skirt not only the rules but the law? we got a lot of explanations that we didn t find particularly
Americans believe yada, yada, yada. martha: we re back on july, and july, 2020 democrat marianne williamson made a story of herself becoming the most searched for candidates but she was absent from the stage on tuesday night. she announced there s no way that she is dropping out this process and said that she s pointing the finger squarely at the dnc for stifling the democratic process and writing and to the washington post, the democratic national committee has sought to narrow the field of presidential candidates the very moment when it should be opening up. facing a political straitjacket on her primary system and the ridiculous rules the party is risking this, back in the story, great to have you back. coming back in. thank you. it s beyond that s a pretty strong indictment of the proces process. i was mentioning before, the constitution doesn t even mention the part of the local party. george washington warned us against that. we had to be very careful
The most serious side effects are angioedema, low blood pressure, kidney problems, or high blood potassium. ask your doctor about entresto, for heart failure. where to next? entrust your heart to entresto. with the democrats, unfortunately they have the vote, they can do it easily. most of them come many of them don t believe they should do it. i really believe that they are going to pay a tremendous price at the polls. harris: the president today confirming he will send a letter to speaker nancy pelosi saying the administration will not cooperate with the impeachment inquiry. until they hold a vote on the matter. they argue democrats are shutting them out of the proces
Restaurant professionals over this. and you say what? i would say wishful thinking. happily, we are not a republic. so unfortunate and so undignified of any member of thousand for presenters. this is a political fight. so we have fights, when it comes to legal process, in the courts. so, see you in court. but no marshall is going to be out arresting anyone. the capitol police are not going anyone. let s go up and have a real democratic process review debate. if we can t agree, and it s a legal issue, we go to court. the court will resolve it, as it always has in our history. harris: as you look historically, i asked our brand-new room to take a look at this. the door that opens up, so both sides can subpoena. does that not happen if nancy pelosi doesn t hold an open vote? by the way, the president s letter could drop any time from today to monday, to
Nancy pelosi, saying all that vote. yes. that s a problem. you are depriving individuals of their voice. not just the representatives, but we the people who elected our representatives, and you re entitled to know how they feel. and, yes, it process. the history of liberty is the history of process. process counts. fundamental fairness. we need to have the protocol, the rules of engagement, so that the republican minority has its rights, and those are clearly delineated. not only has that not been resolved, it hasn t even been done at this stage. it s very unfortunate situation that the speaker has unleashed. for whatever reason, we can have our political thoughts about that. she clearly does not want to vote. harris: i would ask democrats, and i will on this program coming up, how that might benefit and push against his whole thing of witch hunt. to have a balance. anyway, linda tripp. someone you are probably
Think i m having a fair hearing or getting a full hearing from inspector general, there is no suggestion that i know of. at a minimum, why not go to the senate intelligence committee, which has a far different reputation? in terms of fair rent dominic fair mindedness reasonableness. harris: i m wondering if people know that or if you don t just go wherever you go. excuse me for interrupting. whistle-blowers for the process. they know, you know as a federal employee we right side. you are advised of those rights, and you can read about those rights. this is not hidden. this is absolutely clear, that there is a very specific process that you go through that will protect you, but also to help ensure honest government. harris: ken starr, thank you for your time and expertise today. more developments in the ukraine whistleblower controversy, as the intelligence community s watchdog is testifying right behind closed doors.
Process. we should have a vote in the house. if they want to have an impeachment inquiry, but i don t believe we should, but if we want to wish a vote. there should be subpoenas on both sides. the president should be represented by counsel. he should be able to present evidence. harris: and this, house republicans are preparing to force a vote to formally censure house intelligence committee chairman adam schiff when they return from recess. former democratic senator and governor from indiana, evan viacom is with me now pretty senior advisor at apollo global management and chairman of notables pretty good to see you today. democrats, nancy pelosi. should she hold a house vote? which give republicans a chance to subpoena and be part of the process. two things there are no fixed sets of rules because you ve gone through this a few times in our nation s history. we recommend they go back and see how the republicans handle
Familiar with. a former clinton aide, white house aide, during the bill clinton sex scandal. she was the first person you handed over the monica lewinsky calls. she wrote an op-ed. he s an an expert from that periods differed extremes from other west. allies breach have been lined up to assist. the premise for blowing the whistle at all as a concocted and rather flimsy one. credibility based on what we say today. ken starr? i will say this. it s very, i think, questionable that from what we know there was a blur as relationships, without intelligence committee. that is a very polarized committee that is not following the process, as my understanding of the process. but it certainly was not a wise thing to do on the part of it was a ploy, and and a politicid visit. if there was a blur, whoever he or she is, had said i don t
Democratic donors were offering $750,000 and up for people to accuse donald trump of gross crimes, you had to completely disregard there is no barriers for these people, no boundaries, no decorum and it s it s a come abuse of the process. it s drug money, dirty money, it s a perversion of our proces process. laura: really quick come of the mueller, the allegations that republican operatives, the sky jack burkman, people never heard of him he was trained to get someone to accuse mueller of something. what is there? i have no idea. i think the notion that bob mueller is asking for an investigation of some unknown fantasy people making allegations about him is nonsensical. it s part and parcel of the embarrassment that the mueller operation has become. we have one person to think for it, rod rosenstein the most embarrassing deputy attorney general in the history of our country.