Page 4 - Process Crime News Today

including some marked as top secret, and meant to be only available in special government facilities. a list of items removed from the property shows fbi agents took around 20 boxes of items as well as binders of photos, at least one handwritten note and a document about pardoning trumps ally, roger stone. also included was information about the president of france, according to the three-page list. that list contained in a seven-page document also includes the warrant to search the pr...

join us more on the predawn raids and in this case in his home with fake new cnn cameras, how did they get tipped off? the latest details from americas partisan two-tiered system of justice. ♪ ♪ cannot we begin with a fox news alert breaking right now one individual with access to the fbis search warrant used at mar-a-lago is revealing new details about the document. tonight we can exclusively report that the warrant identified two very vague categories of interest. one document sa...

saying he declassified all those documents. in reaction and a second lets go to david spunt, there is a lot of new since then. >> a lot of news and weve been on tv and we will continue to do so. check with the department of justice, no further comment from the doj after merrick garlands comments were he announced he was behind an order of the application the search warrant in mar-a-lago. this is the search and seizure warrant released today and the federal search and seizure warrant fo...

To declassify the documents or take them with him. if he really thought that, why would he ask someone to delete security footage. >> yeah, but the whole thing. if he really thought he had the right to have the documents, there were umpteen ways for him to assert that when he was asked by the government and during that 1 1/2-year period. he never did. he never asserted it in a lawful way. what did he do? he obstructed the subpoena, both subpoenas. >> you said before that at its core this is an o...

>> he says he had a right to declassify the document, or take them with them. if he thought that, why would he ask someone to delete security surveillance footage? >> the whole thing, if he thought he had the right to have that documents, they were umpteen ways for him to assert that when he was asked by the government, during that one and a half year period. he never did. he never asserted it in a lawful way. what did he do? he obstructed the subpoena, and both subpoenas. >> you have said befor...

President who are consistently defending donald trump, is there a larger danger here in dismissing essentially a legal process that has not played itself out? >> well, first of all, hes innocent till proven guilty. absolutely. but the charges are so serious. so to say that a process crime, that obstructing justice is not a serious crime, that trying to destroy evidence wanted by a federal grand jury is not a serious crime, you can say this person is innocent until proven guilty. however, the cha...

Significant new information. given this new information, do you still -- would you still pardon him if you were president? >> the standard i use as our next president is what moves our country forward? what is the right thing for the united states of america? >> right, and would having a president like this move it forward? >> -- is to move on and i would pardon him. i intend to be our next president, and yes, i do believe i will move us forward, and i believe one of the right ways to do that is...

On CNN, the GOP candidate said Trump's alleged efforts to delete a Mar-a-Lago security tape don't warrant a conviction

>> i would pardon him. i intend to be our next president and, yes, i do believe i will move us forward. i think one of the right ways to do that is to pardon the former president of the united states from what is clearly a politicized prosecution. ill share a view with you, is kasie. our general norm is you should not prosecutor somebody of a process crime without evidence of -- >> you think destroying evidence is a process crime? >> it is a process crime. any legal scholar will agree that is de...

One of the 2024 presidential candidates visitic ramaswamy saying well this is a process crime. i dont think that we should be throwing the book at a former president over a process crime. but as joseph points out, it goes to the heart of the primary crime here which is he knew that the documents that he had in his possession, he was not permitted to have them. >> we need to purge process crime from our vocabulary. it came in before in the context of his impeachment and it is coming up again now....