Page 974 - Processes News Today

Committees the way so-called regular order. now, weve seen these processes -- these promises being made time and time again. well see if mr. ryan is actually able to keep that promise. now, i asked a lot of these conservative members who are leaving this meeting just now if they were going to take out their anger at mr. ryan during this vote on wednesday. right now it does not seem like theyre blaming him for this. they do blame speaker boehner here on his final day. but it wasnt just all anger ...

What, i cant tell you what shes taking responsibility for and my main fear is how are we better prepared to avoid the next benghazi if we dont fully understand who made the errors and where the errors were made last time. so with respect to responsibility, with the placing of the mission, with the request for more security i have a perspective which is rooted in the previous arb that the secretary of state, himself or herself, should do that personal review. her position is that there are people...

Responsibility, with the placing of the mission, with the request for more security, i have a perspective which is rooted in the previous arb that the secretary of state, himself or herself, should do that personal review. her position is that there are people and processes in place and she relies on security experts. we have to get that reconciled because i think mr. cummings and i both agree the penultimate objective is to avoid the next benghazi. >> we did a little calculation here on the num...

Information? >> i have a very different interpretation of the phrase personal review than the arb did. i think personal review means exactly what it says, personal review. we had a lot of q and a this morning about specific security instances and specific requests and her response was i have people in processes in place for that. thats fine. thats a fair answer. but you also need to be prepared to answer why you have people and processes in place for security but people and processes were not in...

So with that and -- >> what do you find most rel va toir piece of information? >> well, everybody has their own perspective on that, but i have a very different interpretation of the phrase "personal review" than the arb did, and i think that personal review means exactly what it says personal review. we had a lot of q&a and are responses, and she kept saying, i have people in place for that, and that is all right, and a fair answer, but you have to to be prepared to answer why you have people i...

With my aides. he did not raid security with me. and the security questions and requests were handled by the security professionals. >> madam secretary, with all due respect, those are two separate issues. who chris receivens had access to is one issue, who had access to you and for what is another issue. because you have said you had people and processes in place. you also have people and processes in place for people who want to send you meaningless political advice. you also have people and p...

Answered immediately. he had request contact with my aids. he did not raise security with me. >> with all due respect those are two different issues. who had access to him is one issue and who has access to you is another issue. you had people in place for people who want to inquire about milk and diesel fuel and gasoline. you also have people in processes in place for people who want to provide insults toward folks you work with in the administration. all of that made it districtly into your in...

If you had people and processes in place for security, did you not also have people in processes and place for medicine, gasoline, diesel, milk? >> ive said it before, i will say it again. ill say it as many times as is necessary to respond. chris stephens communicated regularly with the members of my staff. he did not raise security with the members of my staff. i communicated with limb about certain issues. he did not raise security with me. he raised security with the security professionals. ...

Positively. so, yes, he had regular contact with my aids. he did not raise security with me and the security questions and requests were handled by the security professionals. >> with all due respect, those are two separate issues. who chris stevens had access to is one issue. who had access to you and for what is another issue. because you have said you had people and processes in place. . you also have people and processes in place for people who want to send you meaningless political advice. ...

Inbox. so if you had people and processes in place for security, did you not also have people in place for medicine, gasoline, diesel, milk. >> i have said it before and i will say it again. ill say it as many times as is necessary to respond. chris stevens communicates regularly with the members of my staff. he did not raise security with the members of my staff. i communicated with him about certain issues. he did not raise security with me. he raised security with the security professionals. ...