As parts of measures to instill discipline on campus, no fewer than 18 students and five staff of the Ignatius Ajuru University of Education (IAUE), have been expelled and suspended within the past one year due to unruly behavior exhibited on campus.
The Vice Chancellor of the University, Prof. Ozo-Mekuri Ndimele disclosed this in his address at the 38th Convocation ceremony of the university at the main campus, Rumuolumeni, Port Harcourt , recently.
Ndimele said the institution has zero tolerance for indiscipline and campus-prone misconduct including ‘grade sorting’ sex-for-grade, rape, bullying, sexual harassment, examination malpractices, poor attitude to work among others.
Ndimele maintained that the university has no room for cultism and other social vices, adding that it has set up a Committee on Anti-Cultism and Anti-Sorting whose membership he said are known only to himself, the registrar and the members themselves.
COVID-19 Resurgence: NUC Issues Suspension Of Academic Activities
thetidenewsonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thetidenewsonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Nigerian University Ranks 500th Position In The World – Don
thetidenewsonline.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from thetidenewsonline.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
City Bar Clarifies Rules on Discrimination Complaints Under Rule 8.4(g)
USA
December 24 2020
New York is no stranger to anti-discrimination laws. The value of treating individuals equitably is, of course, imbued in our state law (which establishes a formal Division of Human Rights to resolve discrimination claims) and much of our local law (NYC, for example, has its own body of Human Rights Law recognizing a unique set of protected characteristics that musn’t serve as a basis for discrimination). But that value is also enshrined within our Rules of Professional Conduct, and most directly through Rule 8.4(g)’s prohibition on “unlawful[] discriminat[ion] in the practice of law, including in hiring, promoting or otherwise determining conditions of employment on the basis of age, race, creed, color, national origin, sex, disability, marital status or sexual orientation.”