I would say that, i would agree with ian. Public to push back a little on the slippery slope trajectory of skirting the essentialist line. But also to say that i think the Politics Around it can be articulated in particular ways that would also make for me would have appreciable differences with the motivations and the reasons and the justifications for taking a decision not to invest a i with this kind of responsibility and authority. We could also add one other thing, before we opened things up. Is maybe if i come in trying to think of ways to civil by the approach to the kind of claim we are making in a way that might be useful, there is always risks with the simplification. People will look at a policy debate going right now in universities is the idea of using these robot grading systems, these Automated Systems are grading College Students essays which are of course important, particularly for universities that like the Business Model of the mooc because how to take revenge of th
Part of a threeday Holiday Weekend of nonfiction books and authors. Booktv, television for serious readers. You can keep in touch with Current Events from the Nations Capital with cspan radio audio now. Call to hear congressional coverage, Public Affairs forums, and todays washington journal program. Listen for a recap every day on washington today. Cspan radio on audio now. Call 2026268888. Longdistance or phone charges might apply. Next, a group of women judges discussed the challenges of maintaining their independence in a judicial system that is increasingly subjected to partisan issues. Speakers include one of the florida judges involved in the 2000 bush v. Gore case and an iowa judge who lost her job due to a ruling on samesex marriage. This wass cohosted by the this was cohosted by the National Constitution center and the National Association of women judges. Its an hour. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for joining us and welcome to the National Constitution center. Im j
Talk with you and let you and everyone throughout the city know that the San Francisco department of Public Health fully supports prep as an effective hiv prevention strategy in San Francisco and to also further let you know unpraerld the San Francisco dph as prevention in epididymis metrological and have longstanding experience no prep and all of us together are providing leadership and stewarts National Leadership as the direct mentioned theyve provide proposing to their san franciscans at risk for hiv in our city and as we heard from dr. Grant San Francisco has had long expertise and experience with preparing and many strengths to build upon the study was lead by dr. Grant the groundbreaking Multi National study showed prep was effective in reducing freelance females and it is incredibly important globally but very much so in San Francisco because of the population the global raven can be applied to benefit the health of San Francisco furthermore, the San Francisco department of Pub
Access to because money had been set aside in the Health Department for this program to access the housing particularly for the people leaving the hospital and there was a more fluid operation in terms of housing, but again we dont have any more, Mental Health and Substance Abuse and assisted living devices are also high on the request level. The total amount of the Program Expenditures of 2. 8 million, which has been the norm now for some time, and you will see that something that i am very, interested in, and i am very pleased about, is that the average cost per person is 557 dollars a month and i think that is an extraordinary amount when you think about who is being served in this program. And now clearly we have the people who are much higher than that and the people who are lower and it brings us to the norm, but, when you think about over 500 people, served, and you think about that particular, and i think that is Pretty Amazing and i think that later in the report you will see
Have been occurring on a regular basis since Early September so i would like to thank you and i appreciate the time that you have invested in openly communicating with the staff on the house and the senate side of the committee on the implementation issues in the progress that you have been making on this implementation issues. In the va i hope it is a precedent for improving relationships as we go forward. The law provided Additional Resources and authorities to provide for the key improvements for veterans. Timely access to health care, expansion of the internal capacity and the indication of the benefits. Today i hope you will hear tangible ways that benefits. The veterans are getting the outcomes intended. If there are roadblocks to the implementation you need to know what they are and how it can be fixed on those roadblocks. With regards to timely access to health care i am aware that the department has expressed serious concerns with the 90 day deadline on the Choice Program. The