A website as cspan. Work. Of attacks on cspan, a look at a history, current state and future of the internet and it is fluent on democracy. The white house chief digital officer for technology and journalist and former assistance security,or national participated in this discussion at the aspen ideas festival. Of thank you for comment. This session will break down into three parts and in each part we wont how who the question, cap we will talk about the question, can democracy say the internet . We will talk about bots, leakers, facebook. Whether democracy in which media and organizations has moved, everything moved online more weather we can survive or just. Ld. A will start with nate, professor of law at stanford law im going to start with nate persily. Nate is the james b. Mcclatchy professor of law at Stanford Law School and his scholarship focuses on Voting Rights, political parties, Campaign Finance, redistricting and Election Administration. He served as a special master or expe
It is to facilitate those while keeping a list of drugs and people. Air and marine is the supporting element which provides air and Situational Awareness. All three of these critical border lie heavily on technology to accomplish their mission. It is a Crucial Force multiplier and part of a multilayered approach. It was used for at least 20 years now. Instead of focusing solely on the gadgets in the gizmos in the many repeated failures weve had either gets important to think strategically about the decisionmaking process. Better to use the allocated funding in the long term. Today i want to take a hard look at the role that technology plays in helping to predict deter the text and finally interdict the activity. It is the ideal goal of the nations security effort. Its difficult to measure. For security processes they made a may decide its not worth the risk. Essentially deterrence is predicated on two things. The perception that it is a costly endeavor and the likelihood of success is
Hi everyone, thanks for coming. This session we will break into three parts. In each part we will tackle this question, can democracy survive the internet . We are going to talk about trolls and hackers, leakers, twitter, facebook, filter bubbles. Fundamentally this question is whether a democracy in which media and organization is moved online, whether we can survive or adjust to that new world. A will start with nate, professor of law at stanford law school. His scholarship focuses on Voting Rights, political parties, Campaign Finance, redistricting, and elections administration. He served as special master for expert to craft districting plans for many straight and senior director for the Election Administration and his current work examines changing technology on political communications, campaigns, and Election Administration. Broadly that is what he will be talking about here today. With that, lets welcome nathan. [applause] thank you so much. It is an honor to be here. And it is
An august day maybe because its a cool august day what a fantastic turnout on capitol hill and that is due to the extraordinary lineup of people who will be presenting and talking and that brings you here. Five years ago maybe before five years ago the United Nations with the corporations of the United States and many countries around the world began to plan for the future of world Global Developments and it would apply not only to the least developed countries but equally university to the critical space and affairs and human rights for development in the best equipped countries including the United States. Out of that conversation became this extraordinary set of Sustainable Development goals to lead the way for all countries voluntarily to collaborate and how we will achieve the outcomes of those goals as set forth for the years 20152030. We are two years into this and already theres significant progress to talk about the build on the progress of the millennium the following goals t